A Decade of SLEUTHing: Lessons Learned from Applications of a Cellular Automaton Land Use Change Model

This paper reviews the numerous and various applications of the SLEUTH urban growth model over the last decade. SLEUTH is a Cellular Automaton-based urban growth model that uses historical geospatial data for calibration of its parameters. Applications have covered the major cities of the United States, including Detroit, Chicago, New York, Washington, San Francisco and Albuquerque. The model has also been applied in the Netherlands, Portugal, South America, Africa and Australia. Applications have examined the likelihood of urban encroachment on waste disposal sites, the generation of planning scenarios for public decision-making, and the expansion of informal settlements in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Regions covered have varied from a single small town to a whole multi-city urban region, and spatial resolutions have gone from tens of meters to kilometers. The paper assembles for the first time the calibration results from the model applications, and attempts an inter-city comparison, expanding on Silva's concept of the “DNA of regions.” This is possible because the successful calibration of the SLEUTH model from historical land use data gives a set of five parameters that capture the nature of the urban growth in a region. The discussion also summarizes the various lessons learned, especially in how to best calibrate the model. Recent results have shown not only that model performance can be significantly improved using high performance computing, but also that adaptations are possible for searching the parameter space that vastly improve how well the model forecasts growth and change into the future.

[1]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Modeling urban landscape dynamics: A case study in Phoenix, USA , 2004, Urban Ecosystems.

[2]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Testing Popular Visualization Techniques for Representing Model Uncertainty , 2003 .

[3]  J. Landis The California Urban Futures Model: A New Generation of Metropolitan Simulation Models , 1994 .

[4]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Spatio‐temporal dynamics in California's Central Valley: Empirical links to urban theory , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  PREDICTING URBAN GROWTH WITH REMOTE SENSING AND DYNAMIC SPATIAL MODELLING , 2004 .

[6]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Approaches to simulating the "March of Bricks and Mortar" , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  Timothy Evans,et al.  A Review and Assessment of Land-Use Change Models Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice , 2002 .

[8]  Yan Liu,et al.  Mapping the urban development of Sydney (1971–1996) with cellular automata in a GIS environment , 2004 .

[9]  P. Atkinson,et al.  The Limits of Simplicity : Toward Geocomputational Honesty in Urban Modeling , 2004 .

[10]  Elisabete A. Silva,et al.  Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal , 2002 .

[11]  Noah Goldstein,et al.  Brains Vs. Brawn – Comparative Strategies For The Calibration Of A Cellular Automata – Based Urban Growth Model , 2003 .

[12]  R. Sietchiping,et al.  A Geographic Information Systems and cellular automata-based model of informal settlement growth , 2004 .

[13]  David Evans,et al.  Spatial-temporal model for demand and allocation of waste landfills in growing urban regions , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[14]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Assessing the demand of solid waste disposal in urban region by urban dynamics modelling in a GIS environment , 2001 .

[15]  Xiaojun Yang,et al.  Modelling urban growth and landscape changes in the Atlanta metropolitan area , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  K. Clarke,et al.  A Cellular Automaton Model of Wildfire Propagation and Extinction , 1994 .

[17]  Terence R. Smith,et al.  A Content Standard for Computational Models , 2001, D Lib Mag..

[18]  Scott J Goetz,et al.  Assessing Development Pressure in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: An Evaluation of Two Land-Use Change Models , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[19]  Jess W. Everett,et al.  Landfill Siting Using Geographic Information Systems: A Demonstration , 1996 .

[20]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[21]  George R. James Predicting the Spatial Pattern of Urban Growth in Honolulu County Using the Cellular Automata SLEUTH Urban Growth Model , 2005 .

[22]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Spatial Differences in Multi‐Resolution Urban Automata Modeling , 2004, Trans. GIS.

[23]  W. Solecki,et al.  Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land use change model. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Christopher Cogan,et al.  Applications of urban growth models and wildlife habitat models to assess biodiversity losses , 2001 .

[25]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Toby N. Carlson,et al.  Land Use Dynamics of Chester County, Pennsylvania, from a Satellite Remote Sensing Perspective , 2000 .

[27]  Penny Masuoka,et al.  Time-series animation techniques for visualizing urban growth , 1997 .

[28]  S. Goetz,et al.  Using the Sleuth Urban Growth Model to Simulate the Impacts of Future Policy Scenarios on Urban Land Use in the Baltimore-Washington Metropolitan Area , 2004 .

[29]  Laura E. Jackson,et al.  Models for Assessing the Effects of Community Change on Land Use Patterns , 2003 .

[30]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  The Use of Scenarios in Land-Use Planning , 2003 .

[31]  Leonard J. Gaydos,et al.  An analysis of human-induced land transformations in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento area , 1994 .