Minimum-phase calibration of sampling oscilloscopes

We describe an algorithm for determining the minimum phase of a linear time-invariant response function from its magnitude. The procedure is based on Kramers-Kronig relations in combination with auxiliary direct measurements of the desired phase response. We demonstrate that truncation of the Hilbert transform gives rise to large errors in estimated phase, but that these errors may be approximated using a small number of basis functions. As an example, we obtain a minimum-phase calibration of a sampling oscilloscope in the frequency domain. This result rests on data obtained by an electrooptic sampling (EOS) technique in combination with a swept-sine calibration procedure. The EOS technique yields magnitude and phase information over a broad bandwidth, yet has degraded uncertainty estimates from dc to approximately 1 GHz. The swept-sine procedure returns only the magnitude of the oscilloscope response function, yet may be performed on a fine frequency grid from about 1 MHz to several gigahertz. The resulting minimum-phase calibration spans frequencies from dc to 110 GHz, and is traceable to fundamental units. The validity of the minimum-phase character of the oscilloscope response function at frequencies common to both measurements is determined as part of our analysis. A full uncertainty analysis is provided

[1]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[2]  Paul D. Hale,et al.  Estimating the Magnitude and Phase Response of a 50 GHz Sampling Oscilloscope Using the "Nose-to-Nose" Method , 2000, 55th ARFTG Conference Digest.

[3]  J. Mobley,et al.  Finite-bandwidth effects on the causal prediction of ultrasonic attenuation of the power-law form. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  John R. Juroshek,et al.  A Direct Calibration Method for Measuring Equivalent Source Mismatch | NIST , 1997 .

[5]  Dylan F. Williams,et al.  A General Waveguide Circuit Theory , 1992, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[6]  木村 充 A.Papoulis: The Fourier Integral and its Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York 1962, 306頁, 15×23cm, $12.00. , 1963 .

[7]  J.M. Morgan,et al.  Calibrating electro-optic sampling systems , 2001, 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157).

[8]  L. Zalcman,et al.  Fourier Series and Integrals , 2007 .

[9]  L. Greengard,et al.  Analytic continuation, singular-value expansions, and Kramers-Kronig analysis , 2001 .

[10]  F. M. Tesche On the use of the Hilbert transform for processing measured CW data , 1992 .

[11]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[12]  P. Hale,et al.  Covariance-based uncertainty analysis of the NIST electrooptic sampling system , 2006, IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques.

[13]  Jan Verspecht,et al.  Analysis of Interconnection Networks and Mismatch in the Nose-to-Nose Calibration , 2000, 55th ARFTG Conference Digest.

[14]  Paul Penfield,et al.  De-Embedding and Unterminating , 1974 .

[15]  P. Hale,et al.  Calibrating photoreceiver response to 110 GHz , 2002, The 15th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society.

[16]  A. Dienstfrey,et al.  Calibration of sampling oscilloscopes with high-speed photodiodes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[17]  G. Arfken,et al.  Mathematical methods for physicists 6th ed. , 1996 .

[18]  Interpretation and identification of minimum phase reflection coefficients , 2001 .

[19]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[20]  A. Papoulis,et al.  The Fourier Integral and Its Applications , 1963 .

[21]  Andreas Steininger,et al.  On the determination of dynamic errors for rise time measurement with an oscilloscope , 1999, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..