Production Modeling in the Eagle Ford Gas Condensate Window: Integrating New Relationships between Core Permeability, Pore Size, and Confined PVT Properties

Transport properties and mechanisms as well as phase behavior under nanoscale confinement exhibit deviations from their bulk behavior. This is due to the significant effect of molecule-wall interactions as well as molecule-molecule interactions in shale formations which are mainly characterized by nanopores. Consequently, the critical temperatures and pressures and transport properties of hydrocarbon mixtures under nanopores confinement are influenced strongly by fluid molecule-pore wall interactions. The effect of phase behavior on production from a shale gas condensate reservoir is studied where nanopores present either as the dominate storage region and when dispersed with pores with bulk behavior. The effect of pore size on phase behavior is considered by using modified critical properties for different pore sizes in the phase behavior calculations. Permeability, porosity, and mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) tests are run on several Eagle ford core plugs. Using experimental results, an equation for estimation of mean pore size as a function of permeability and porosity is presented. A shale gas condensate reservoir with an Eagle Ford gas condensate as the reservoir fluid is modeled. The reservoir pressure, dew point pressure and temperature are 5000 psia, 3800 psia and 180 °F, respectively. Pore size distribution of one of the samples is used in the reservoir modeling. Based on MICP experiments and pore-throat size distribution, the pore volume of the reservoir was divided into five regions: bulk (pore sizes more than 50nm (10% PV)), 20-50nm (12% of PV), 12-20nm (29% of PV), 7-12nm (39% of PV), and less than 7nm (10% of PV). For each region, a specific permeability was assigned using the new developed correlation. Three different types of connectives between pores were considered: 1pore sizes from smallest to largest connected to the fracture in series, 2pore sizes from largest to smallest connected to the fracture in series, and 3completely random distribution. Results showed that by decreasing the pore size, dew point pressures decrease between 5 to 24%, fluid tends to behave as a dry gas and the two-phase region shrinks therefore condensate drop-out and near wellbore permeability impairment is reduced. After 15 years of production, condensate saturation around fracture is up to 7% less under confinement effects. Gas and condensate viscosities under confinement decrease 3-16% and 10-50% respectively. Confinement did not affect gas production significantly but condensate production increased more than 30%. Production analysis showed that Permeability is overestimated by 30% if bulk PVT is used instead of modified PVT with pore size. Phase behavior effect has a positive contribution to production while considering permeability variation with pore size has a negative impact on production. Connectivity type between different pore sizes has a pronounced effect and determines which of these factors has more impact on production. Introduction In the past decade, there has been a rapid growth in production from unconventional condensate and gas resources. Due to the importance of these low permeability reservoirs in condensate and gas production, a lot of research has been conducted on these types of resources. Modeling studies on unconventional resources indicate applying physics of fluid and flow behavior in conventional reservoirs under predict production from unconventional resources (Javadpour 2009; Swami, 2012). Therefore in simulation studies in order to match production data, core derived matrix permeability and/or Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) are artificially increased (Swami, 2012). It has been observed that pore sizes of unconventional resources are in the range of 1-200 nm (Cipolla et al., 2009). Different previous studies show that the thermophysical properties of fluids under confinement deviate from its bulk value (Gelb,

[1]  Hideki Tanaka,et al.  Phase equilibria and interfacial tension of fluids confined in narrow pores. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  K. Gubbins,et al.  Phase separation in confined systems , 1999 .

[3]  Jayant K. Singh,et al.  Vapor-Liquid Phase Coexistence, Critical Properties, and Surface Tension of Confined Alkanes , 2009 .

[4]  J. Singh,et al.  Effect of pore morphology on vapor–liquid phase transition and crossover behavior of critical properties from 3D to 2D , 2011 .

[5]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Reservoir Modeling and Production Evaluation in Shale-Gas Reservoirs , 2009 .

[6]  Carl H. Sondergeld,et al.  Measuring low permeabilities of gas-sands and shales using a pressure transmission technique , 2011 .

[7]  A. Vishnyakov,et al.  Critical Properties of Lennard-Jones Fluids in Narrow Slit-Shaped Pores , 2001 .

[8]  B. Smit,et al.  Adsorption and separation of linear and branched alkanes on carbon nanotube bundles from configurational-bias Monte Carlo simulation , 2005 .

[9]  Mario H. Gonzalez,et al.  The Viscosity of Natural Gases , 1966 .

[10]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Phase Behavior of Gas Condensates in Shales Due to Pore Proximity Effects: Implications for Transport, Reserves and Well Productivity , 2012 .

[11]  A. Jamili,et al.  Modifying van der Waals Equation of State to Consider Influence of Confinement on Phase Behavior , 2013 .

[12]  P. M. Dranchuk,et al.  Calculation of Z Factors For Natural Gases Using Equations of State , 1975 .

[13]  Vivek Swami Shale Gas Reservoir Modeling: From Nanopores to Laboratory , 2012 .

[14]  Tadesse Weldu Teklu,et al.  Multiphase Compositional Modeling in Small-Scale Pores of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs , 2013 .

[15]  S. Sandler,et al.  Critical behavior of pure confined fluids from an extension of the van der Waals equation of state , 2010 .