Principals’ support for teachers’ working conditions in devolved school settings: Insights from two Australian States

Shifts in schooling policy have had substantial impact upon the role of principals as well as the relationship that principals have with their teaching staff. In this paper we report on the initiatives 30 principals in a diverse range of devolved Australian government schools adopt to shape and support the local, school-level working conditions of teachers. Surprisingly, principals were commonly unable to articulate – or even respond to – this matter. More commonly principals reported being oriented to lifting capability through a focus on student outcomes, a focus that is consistent with much of the devolution and autonomy rhetoric. Of those who could respond regarding working conditions, dispositions of paternalistic ‘care’, basic distributive actions or even a lack of influence or control were reported, and clear spatial and social dimensions accompanied these patterns. Given that devolution has recently created new responsibilities for principals in Australian government schools, including in relation to staff, this finding is understandable but none the less holds substantial implications and raises questions about the managerial capacity needed for schools to be sustainable, positive workplaces.

[1]  Michael Gordon.  Managing , 2019, Becoming a Social Entrepreneur.

[2]  M. Stacey.  The teacher ‘problem’: an analysis of the NSW education policy Great Teaching, Inspired Learning , 2017 .

[3]  S. McGrath-Champ,et al.  Differentiation as a Consequence of Choice and Decentralization Reforms—Conditions for Teachers’ Competence Development , 2017 .

[4]  Philip Riley,et al.  Emotional demands, emotional labour and occupational outcomes in school principals , 2017 .

[5]  A. Bakker,et al.  Teachers’ Priorities for Change in Australian Schools to Support Staff Well-Being , 2017 .

[6]  S. McGrath-Champ,et al.  Devolving authority: the impact of giving public schools power to hire staff , 2017 .

[7]  P. Thomson,et al.  Freedom to What Ends?- School Autonomy in Neoliberal Times , 2017 .

[8]  Harry Torrance.  Blaming the victim: assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance , 2017 .

[9]  S. McGrath-Champ,et al.  Teachers, school choice and competition: Lock-in effects within and between sectors , 2017 .

[10]  M. Corbett.  Understanding Social Justice in Rural Education , 2017 .

[11]  G. Thompson,et al.  The politics of teaching time in disciplinary and control societies , 2017 .

[12]  B. Caldwell.  Impact of School Autonomy on Student Achievement: Cases from Australia. , 2016 .

[13]  Karolina Parding,et al.  Teachers’ Working Conditions Amid Swedish School Choice Reform: Avenues for Further Research , 2016 .

[14]  P. Sammons,et al.  The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes , 2016 .

[15]  D. Suggett.  School autonomy: necessary but not sufficient , 2015 .

[16]  John Williamson,et al.  Teacher Involvement in Australia , 2015 .

[17]  Chris Freeman,et al.  Australian teachers and the learning environment: an analysis of teacher response to TALIS 2013 , 2014 .

[18]  S. Orphanos,et al.  Learning leadership matters , 2014 .

[19]  Sam Sellar,et al.  ‘Catalyst data’: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling , 2013 .

[20]  S. Dinham,et al.  The Development, Endorsement and Adoption of a National Standard for Principals in Australia , 2013 .

[21]  R. Connell.  The neoliberal cascade and education: an essay on the market agenda and its consequences , 2013 .

[22]  C. Brock.  Comparative Education And The Geographical Factor , 2013 .

[23]  C. Doherty,et al.  Educational markets in space: gamekeeping professionals across Australian communities , 2013 .

[24]  H. Jons,et al.  Geographies of education and learning , 2012 .

[25]  Caroline F. Mansfield,et al.  Considering ‘teacher resilience’ from critical discourse and labour process theory perspectives , 2012 .

[26]  A. Rainnie,et al.  Failing forward: public schools and new public management , 2012 .

[27]  J. Smyth.  The disaster of the ‘self‐managing school’ – genesis, trajectory, undisclosed agenda, and effects , 2011 .

[28]  Glenn Rowley,et al.  Staff in Australia's schools 2010 : main report on the survey , 2011 .

[29]  Chris Freeman,et al.  Australian teachers and the learning environment : an analysis of teacher response to TALIS 2008 : final report , 2010 .

[30]  C. Thiem.  Thinking through education: the geographies of contemporary educational restructuring , 2009 .

[31]  E. Hoyle,et al.  Leadership for professional practice , 2008 .

[32]  Lejf Moos,et al.  Successful principals: telling or selling? On the importance of context for school leadership , 2008 .

[33]  M. Wallace.  Towards Effective Management of a Reformed Teaching Profession , 2008 .

[34]  Susan Johnson.  The Workplace Matters Teacher Quality, Retention, and Effectiveness , 2006 .

[35]  E. Hoyle,et al.  Educational Leadership: Ambiguity, Professionals and Managerialism , 2005 .

[36]  S. Clarke,et al.  Context Counts: Viewing Small School Leadership from the Inside out. , 2004 .

[37]  S. Robertson,et al.  Local States of Emergency: The contradictions of neo-liberal governance in education in New Zealand , 2002 .

[38]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .