Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change

While various theories have been proposed to explain how technology leads to organizational change, in general they have focused either on the technology and ignored the influence of human agency, or on social interaction and ignored the technology. In this paper, we propose a new theory of technology-mediated organizational change that bridges these two extremes. Using grounded theory methodology, we conducted a three-year study of an enterprise system implementation. From the data collected, we identified embeddedness as central to the process of change. When embedded in technology, organizational elements such as routines and roles acquire a material aspect, in addition to the ostensive and performative aspects identified by Feldman and Pentland (2003). Our new theory employs the lens of critical realism because in our view, common constructivist perspectives such as structuration theory or actor network theory have limited our understanding of technology as a mediator of organizational change. Using a critical realist perspective, our theory explains the process of change as a three-stage cycle in which the ostensive, performative, and material aspects of organizational elements interact differently in each stage.

[1]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[2]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  劉秋菊,et al.  Actor-Network Theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 2007 .

[4]  H DavenportThomas.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system , 1998 .

[5]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[6]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[7]  Markus C. Becker.  Organizational routines: a review of the literature , 2004 .

[8]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[9]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[10]  L. Willcocks,et al.  What We May Learn From the Social Shaping of Technology Approach , 2005 .

[11]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[12]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[13]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[14]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering , 1997 .

[15]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[16]  William Outhwaite.  Realism and Social Science , 1987 .

[17]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Actor-network theory and information systems , 2004 .

[18]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[19]  John Mingers,et al.  Re-Establishing the Real: Critical Realism and Information Systems , 2004 .

[20]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[21]  S FeldmanMartha.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[22]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[23]  John Mingers,et al.  Real-izing information systems: critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[25]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[26]  B. Latour.  Social Theory and the Study of Computerized Work Sites , 1996 .

[27]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[28]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[29]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems , 2002 .

[30]  Philip J. Dobson.  The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[31]  M. Feldman.  A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[32]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[33]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[34]  G. Ritzer.  Structuration Theory , 2007 .

[35]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[36]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  P. Pettit.  The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[38]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[39]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[42]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[43]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[44]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  What is ERP? , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[45]  Rom Harré,et al.  Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy , 1997 .

[46]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[49]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[50]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[51]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[52]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[53]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[54]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[55]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[56]  M. Reed,et al.  In Praise of Duality and Dualism: Rethinking Agency and Structure in Organizational Analysis , 1997 .

[57]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[58]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[59]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.