Enhanced jump performance when providing augmented feedback compared to an external or internal focus of attention

Abstract Factors such as an external focus of attention (EF) and augmented feedback (AF) have been shown to improve performance. However, the efficacy of providing AF to enhance motor performance has never been compared with the effects of an EF or an internal focus of attention (IF). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify which of the three conditions (AF, EF or IF) leads to the highest performance in a countermovement jump (CMJ). Nineteen volunteers performed 12 series of 8 maximum CMJs. Changes in jump height between conditions and within the series were analysed. Jump heights differed between conditions (P < 0.001), resulting in best performance with AF (32.04 ± 7.11 cm), followed by EF (31.21 ± 6.67 cm) and IF (30.77 ± 6.87 cm). Significantly different (P < 0.001) within-series effects of higher jump heights at the end of the series in AF (+1.60%) and lower jump heights at the end of the series in EF (−1.79%) and IF (−1.68%) were observed. Muscle activity did not differ between conditions. The differences between conditions and within the series provide evidence that AF leads to higher performance and better progression within one series than EF and IF. Consequently, AF seems to outperform EF and IF when maximising jump height.

[1]  G. Wulf,et al.  Increased Jump Height with an External Focus Due to Enhanced Lower Extremity Joint Kinetics , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  J. Porter,et al.  Effect of Attentional Focus Strategies on Peak Force and Performance in the Standing Long Jump , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[3]  G. Wulf,et al.  EMG Activity as a Function of the Performer's Focus of Attention , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  G. Wulf.  Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 years , 2013 .

[5]  E. D. Bruin,et al.  Should Rehabilitation Specialists Use External Focus Instructions When Motor Learning Is Fostered , 2013 .

[6]  J. Porter,et al.  Instructing Skilled Athletes to Focus Their Attention Externally at Greater Distances Enhances Jumping Performance , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  Colm Murphy,et al.  The need and benefit of augmented feedback on service speed in tennis. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  D A Brodie,et al.  Sources of error in isokinetic dynamometry: effects of visual feedback on maximum torque. , 1991, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[9]  D. Hopper,et al.  The influence of visual feedback on power during leg press on elite women field hockey players , 2003 .

[10]  J. Hardy,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Applied Sport Psychology Effects of Attentional Focus on Skilled Performance in Golf , 2022 .

[11]  N. Hagemann,et al.  An internal focus of attention is not always as bad as its reputation: how specific aspects of internally focused attention do not hinder running efficiency. , 2014, Journal of sport & exercise psychology.

[12]  Keith Davids,et al.  Focus of attention and its impact on movement behaviour. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[13]  G. Wulf,et al.  Increased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus. , 2010, Human movement science.

[14]  Martin Keller,et al.  Improving motor performance: Selected aspects of augmented feedback in exercise and health , 2014, European journal of sport science.

[15]  J. Porter,et al.  Increasing the Distance of an External Focus of Attention Enhances Standing Long Jump Performance , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  W. Taube,et al.  Jump performance and augmented feedback: immediate benefits and long-term training effects. , 2014, Human movement science.

[17]  J. Porter,et al.  Standing Long-Jump Performance is Enhanced when Using an External Focus of Attention , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[18]  T. Kakebeeke,et al.  Should Rehabilitation Specialists Use External Focus Instructions When Motor Learning Is Fostered? A Systematic Review , 2013 .

[19]  Stephen F. Figoni,et al.  Effects of Knowledge of Results on Reciprocal, Isokinetic Strength and Fatigue , 1984 .

[20]  A. Healy,et al.  Neuromuscular Effects of Shifting the Focus of Attention in a Simple Force Production Task , 2011, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  Matt Greig,et al.  Attentional Focusing Instructions Influence Force Production and Muscular Activity During Isokinetic Elbow Flexions , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[22]  J. Brehm,et al.  The intensity of motivation. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.