A Design-based Approach to Fostering Understanding of Global Climate Change

To prepare students to make informed decisions and gain coherent understanding about global climate change, we tested and refined a middle school inquiry unit that featured interactive visualizations. Based on evidence from student pre-test responses, we increased emphasis on energy transfer and transformation. The first iteration improved comprehension of the visualizations resulting in better understanding of energy transfer (n = 67). The second iteration improved understanding of energy transformation (n = 109) by adding pivotal cases, reducing deceptive clarity, and emphasizing distinguishing of ideas. Focusing student investigations in the second version allowed students to make more normative, personally relevant decisions related to their energy use. These iterative refinements reflected knowledge integration principles and offer guidance for designers of inquiry units.

[1]  P. Martin,et al.  Diet, Energy, and Global Warming , 2006 .

[2]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[3]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations , 2011 .

[4]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction , 2005 .

[5]  Vanessa Svihla,et al.  Redesigning global climate change for cumulative learning , 2010, ICLS.

[6]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[7]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  The Role of Self-monitoring in Learning Chemistry with Dynamic Visualizations , 2012 .

[8]  Lei Liu,et al.  Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia , 2009 .

[9]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[10]  Keisha Varma.  Using interactive models to support content learning through scientific reasoning , 2010, ICLS.

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[12]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[13]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems , 2009 .

[14]  Jennifer L. Chiu,et al.  Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science , 2006, Science.

[15]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The case for case studies of programming problems , 1992, CACM.

[16]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective , 2010 .

[17]  Theodore Smith,et al.  History-Social Science Framework for California Public Schools. Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. , 1981 .

[18]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .

[19]  Anne Marie Todd,et al.  Climate Change Education and the Ecological Footprint , 2008 .

[20]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .

[21]  Douglas P Larsen,et al.  Test-enhanced learning , 2013 .

[22]  Brian J. Reiser.  Designing learning environments to support students’ integrated understanding: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy , 2008 .

[23]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[24]  W. McComas.  Benchmarks for Science Literacy , 2014 .

[25]  Joan Sabaté,et al.  Diet and the environment: does what you eat matter? , 2009, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[26]  Allan Collins,et al.  THE COMPUTER AS A TOOL FOR LEARNING THROUGH REFLECTION , 1986 .

[27]  Elizabeth A. Davis.  Creating Critique Projects , 2013 .

[28]  M. Joachimski,et al.  Devonian climate and reef evolution: Insights from oxygen isotopes in apatite , 2009 .

[29]  Iris Tabak,et al.  BGuILE: Stragtegic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms , 2001 .

[30]  B. Andersson,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect, the Societal Consequences of Reducing CO2 Emissions and the Problem of Ozone Layer Depletion. , 2000 .

[31]  J. Levin.  Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners , 2003 .

[32]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Thinking Like a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Firefly: Learning Biology Through Constructing and Testing Computational Theories—An Embodied Modeling Approach , 2006 .

[33]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2009 .

[34]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[35]  H. Strauss,et al.  Modeling the carbon and sulfur isotope compositions of marine sediments: Climate evolution during the Devonian , 2007 .

[36]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[37]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  WISE Science: Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom , 2009 .

[38]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .