The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences

Compression is used in hearing aids to compensate for the effects of loudness recruitment. This article describes the distinction between, and relative merits of, slow and fast compression systems. A study of Gatehouse and coworkers leads to the following conclusions: (a) The benefit from compression is greatest among individuals who experience a wide range of sound levels within short periods of time, (b) slow compression generally leads to higher listening comfort than fast compression, (c) the benefit from fast compression varies across individuals, and those with high cognitive ability are able to benefit from fast compression to take advantage of temporal dips in a background sound. It is argued that listening in the dips depends on the ability to process the temporal fine structure of sounds. It is proposed that a test of the ability to process temporal fine structure might be useful for selecting compression speed for an individual.

[1]  H Dillon.  Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[2]  S. Bacon,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 2. Patterns of candidature , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[4]  B C Moore,et al.  Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[5]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.

[6]  T Houtgast,et al.  Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[10]  C Elberling,et al.  Non-linear signal processing in digital hearing aids. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[11]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.

[12]  Torben Poulsen,et al.  Auditory Models and Non-linear Hearing Instruments , 1999 .

[13]  A Goedegebure,et al.  Compression and its Effect on the Speech Signal , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[14]  B C Moore,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Hearing Research.

[17]  Charles E. Robinson,et al.  The Intelligibility of Speech Processed by Delayed Long‐Time‐Averaged Compression Amplification , 1973 .

[18]  Brian C J Moore.  How Much Do We Gain by Gain Control in Hearing Aids? , 1990 .

[19]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment: Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditivos , 2001 .

[22]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  R. Plomp.  The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .

[24]  Me Lutman,et al.  International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research , 2008 .

[25]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[26]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  E. Fowler,et al.  A METHOD FOR THE EARLY DETECTION OF OTOSCLEROSIS: A STUDY OF SOUNDS WELL ABOVE THRESHOLD , 1936 .

[28]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B. Moore,et al.  Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[30]  Brian C. J. Moore.  The role of temporal fine structure in normal and impaired hearing , 2007 .

[31]  J. Żabiński.  American National Standards Institute (ANSI) , 2010 .

[32]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation , 1996 .

[33]  Michael Kiefte,et al.  Sensitivity to change in perception of speech , 2003, Speech Commun..

[34]  B. Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  A. Duquesnoy.  Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  B. Moore,et al.  Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  H. Gustafsson,et al.  Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise , 1991 .

[38]  Brian C J Moore.  Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Mark B. Gardner,et al.  The Dependence of Hearing Impairment on Sound Intensity , 1937 .

[40]  Frédéric Berthommier,et al.  Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.

[41]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[42]  E Villchur,et al.  Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[44]  B. Moore,et al.  Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[47]  I M Noordhoek,et al.  Effect of reducing temporal intensity modulations on sentence intelligibility. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  T Lunner,et al.  A Digital Filterbank Hearing Aid: Three Digital Signal Processing Algorithms‐User Preference and Performance , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[49]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[50]  W. Dreschler,et al.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[51]  L M Hickson.  Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids. , 1994, American journal of audiology.

[52]  P. Blamey.  Adaptive Dynamic Range Optimization (ADRO): A Digital Amplification Strategy for Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants , 2005, Trends in amplification.