Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents’ training and opinions on robotic surgery

To investigate obstetrics and gynecology residents’ access to training in robotics and their opinions of its utility and future in gynecologic surgery a 31-item questionnaire was developed and distributed to Ob/Gyn residents in the United States via email. Results were tabulated via SurveyMonkey.com©. A total of 470 residents representative of all ACOG districts and PGY levels responded. A total of 72% of residents reported ≥3 staff surgeons performing robotic gynecologic surgery at their institution and 70% had participated in robotic surgery in the past 12 months. Robotic hysterectomy (81%) and oncologic surgery (76%) were the most frequently performed procedures. A total of 79% believe their institution should provide formal training in robotics, but only 38% report access to it. A total of 23% have operated at the surgeon console, and 44% plan to incorporate robotic surgery into their practice after completing residency. A total of 3.6% feel equipped to perform robotic surgery without additional training. A total of 63% believe robotic surgery in gynecology will continue to increase in popularity. Exposure to gynecologic robotic procedures during residency is increasing. Although residents believe robotics has a place in gynecology, many feel formalized training has not been successfully implemented into their residency. Development of a structured program for training residents in robotics merits further investigation.

[1]  L. Eichel,et al.  Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2006, Urology.

[2]  J. Magrina.  Robotic surgery in gynecology. , 2007, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[3]  T. Judkins,et al.  Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  M. Monga,et al.  Urology practice patterns after residency training in laparoscopy. , 2002, Journal of endourology.

[5]  Inderbir S Gill,et al.  Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[6]  S. Mason,et al.  EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[7]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Smaller pieces of the hysterectomy pie: current challenges in resident surgical education. , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  H. Karamanoukian,et al.  Are you Ready to Become a Robo-Surgeon? , 2003, The American surgeon.

[9]  Steven D. Wexner,et al.  The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  T. N. Payne,et al.  A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. , 2008, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[11]  C. Steiner,et al.  Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990–1997 , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  James A. Young,et al.  Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[13]  Jennifer M Wu,et al.  Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003 , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Jacob Bergsland,et al.  Survey of Resident Training in Robotic Surgery , 2002, The American surgeon.

[15]  Arnold P Advincula,et al.  Robotic gynecologic surgery. , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.