Electron signatures of active merging sites on the magnetopause

[1] Near magnetopause current layers the Polar satellite often detects field-aligned fluxes of >0.5 keV electrons that carry heat flux away from merging sites along inner/outer separatrices between newly opened and closed/interplanetary magnetic flux. Close to separator lines, electron gyrotropy weakens to break trapping on closed field lines of the outer plasma sheet followed by attachment to newly opened flux at random pitch angles. Energetic electrons in the “tails” of distribution functions quickly move great distances along separatrices to act as surgical indicators of active merging. If IMF BY is large, field rotation in the magnetopause current layer can be ≪180°, obscuring relationships between merging sources and separatrices. Suprathermal electrons and accelerated ions moving along nearby inner and outer edges of moderate shear current layers are remote signatures of merging at widely separate locations. Detecting accelerated ions at a moderate shear magnetopause is insufficient evidence for component merging occurring near a spacecraft. During magnetopause-skimming passes Polar sampled electron tail events characteristic of inner and outer separatrices that typically lasted from a few tens of seconds to several minutes. The 557.7-nm emissions observed at cusp boundaries suggest that their sources operate on similar timescales and are active simultaneously at multiple locations. The magnetic conjugacy of inner separatrices with cusp boundaries as well as the similar timescales of electron tail and 557.7-nm emission events strongly indicates that they are causally connected. Combining the two types of measurements offers an effective technique for separating temporal and spatial variability in magnetopause dynamics.

[1]  N. Maynard Coupling the Solar-Wind/IMF to the Ionosphere Through the High Latitude CUSPS , 2005 .

[2]  Nancy U. Crooker,et al.  Dayside merging and cusp geometry , 1979 .

[3]  S. Petrinec,et al.  Location of the reconnection line for northward interplanetary magnetic field , 2004 .

[4]  S. Cowley The causes of convection in the Earth's magnetosphere: A review of developments during the IMS , 1982 .

[5]  John R Wygant,et al.  The electric field instrument on the polar satellite , 1995 .

[6]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Observations of bow shock and magnetopause crossings from geosynchronous orbit on 31 March 2001 , 2002 .

[7]  Michelle F. Thomsen,et al.  The electron edge of low latitude boundary layer during accelerated flow events , 1990 .

[8]  B. Anderson,et al.  Electron and ion signatures of field line topology at the low-shear magnetopause , 1997 .

[9]  J. W. Griffee,et al.  Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer , 1998 .

[10]  T. Zawistowski,et al.  Hydra — A 3-dimensional electron and ion hot plasma instrument for the POLAR spacecraft of the GGS mission , 1995 .

[11]  C. Russell,et al.  Patterns of potential magnetic field merging sites on the dayside magnetopause , 1984 .

[12]  G. Siscoe,et al.  MHD Simulation of Magnetospheric Transport at the Mesoscale , 2013 .

[13]  M. Hairston,et al.  Ring current and the magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling during the superstorm of 20 November 2003 , 2005 .

[14]  William J. Burke,et al.  Observed and simulated depletion layers with southward IMF , 2004 .

[15]  George L. Siscoe,et al.  Response of ionospheric convection to changes in the interplanetary magnetic field: Lessons from a MHD simulation , 2001 .

[16]  D. Hunten,et al.  Depletion of solar wind plasma near a planetary boundary , 1976 .

[17]  J. Scudder,et al.  Observations of electron beams in the low-latitude boundary layer , 1984 .

[18]  K. Hain The partial donor cell method , 1978 .

[19]  D. Pierce,et al.  The GGS/POLAR magnetic fields investigation , 1995 .

[20]  C. Russell,et al.  Reconnection at the high‐latitude magnetopause during northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions , 2001 .

[21]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Temporal-spatial structure of magnetic merging at the magnetopause inferred from 557.7-nm all-sky images , 2004 .

[22]  F. Mozer,et al.  A quantitative model for the potential resulting from reconnection with an arbitrary interplanetary magnetic field , 1974 .

[23]  Christopher T. Russell,et al.  Fingerprints of collisionless reconnection at the separator, I, Ambipolar‐Hall signatures , 2002 .

[24]  G. Siscoe,et al.  Observation of the magnetospheric “sash” and its implications relative to solar‐wind/magnetospheric coupling: A multisatellite event analysis , 2001 .

[25]  M. W. Dunlop,et al.  Polar, Cluster and SuperDARN Evidence for High-Latitude Merging during Southward IMF: Temporal/Spatial Evolution , 2003 .

[26]  M. Acuna,et al.  The ACE Magnetic Fields Experiment , 1998 .

[27]  V. Vasyliūnas Theoretical models of magnetic field line merging , 1975 .

[28]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Observations of simultaneous effects of merging in both hemispheres , 2001 .

[29]  Dan Winske,et al.  Collisionless reconnection supported by nongyrotropic pressure effects in hybrid and particle simulations , 2001 .

[30]  A. Shleifer,et al.  We are grateful. , 1971, American journal of public health.

[31]  T. Eastman,et al.  Energetic Particle Observations in the Low‐Latitude Boundary Layer , 1985 .

[32]  I. Papamastorakis,et al.  Evidence for magnetic field reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause , 1981 .

[33]  B. Anderson,et al.  Particle signatures of magnetic topology at the magnetopause: AMPTE/CCE observations , 1995 .

[34]  A. Ridley,et al.  Transpolar potential saturation models compared , 2004 .