The social body in motion: cognitive development in infants and androids

During the past two decades, embodiment has become an important concept in many areas of cognitive science, but so far there is no common understanding of what constitutes embodied cognition and what kind of body an artificial humanlike cognizer would require. Work in embodied artificial intelligence and robotics has addressed, to some degree, what kind of bodily implementation is necessary for embodied cognition, but crucial factors such as the role of social interaction and the ‘body-in-motion’ have still not received much attention. We argue that, in the human child, the interplay of social scaffolding and self-induced locomotion is fundamental to the development of joint attention and a ‘self’. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of the social dynamics of bodily experience for android science. We argue that keeping scientific and engineering perspectives apart, but also understanding their relation, is important for clarifying the objectives of android science. Parts of this paper have appeared in similar form in Lindblom and Ziemke (2005a, b) and Ziemke and Lindblom (2006).

[1]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  What baboons, babies and Tetris players tell us about interaction: a biosocial view of norm-based social learning , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[2]  T. Ziemke What’s that Thing Called Embodiment? , 2003 .

[3]  J. Carpendale,et al.  Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[5]  R. Gibbs Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[6]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[7]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations , 2002 .

[9]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  S. Gallagher How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[11]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  H. Hendriks-Jansen Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought , 1996 .

[13]  Jessica Lindblom,et al.  Embodied Action as a 'Helping Hand' in Social Interaction , 2006 .

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  What computers still can't do - a critique of artificial reason , 1992 .

[16]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  H. Kozima,et al.  A Robot that Learns to Communicate with Human Caregivers , 2001 .

[18]  Rosalind W. Picard Affective Computing , 1997 .

[19]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[20]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[21]  Jordan Zlatev,et al.  The Epigenesis of Meaning in Human Beings, and Possibly in Robots , 2001, Minds and Machines.

[22]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  The Body-in-Motion and Social Scaffolding : Implications for Human and Android Cognitive Development , 2005 .

[23]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  Review of Interaction design , 2003 .

[24]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Android science: conscious and subconscious recognition , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[25]  T. Ziemke The Construction of ‘Reality’ in the Robot: Constructivist Perspectives on Situated Artificial Intelligence and Adaptive Robotics , 2001 .

[26]  Charles R. Varela Harré and Merleau‐Ponty: beyond the absent moving body in embodied social theory , 1994 .

[27]  T. Ziemke,et al.  Some methodological issues in android science , 2006 .

[28]  S. Hurley Consciousness in Action , 2000 .

[29]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[30]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[31]  B. Farnell Moving Bodies, Acting Selves , 1999 .

[32]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The motor theory of social cognition: a critique , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  The eyes, the hand, and the mind: behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of social cognition , 2001 .

[34]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  RobotCub: an open framework for research in embodied cognition , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..

[35]  A. Clark Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[36]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[37]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Humanlike conversation with gestures and verbal cues based on a three-layer attention-drawing model , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[38]  John R. Searle,et al.  Minds, brains, and programs , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Social Situatedness of Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Vygotsky and Beyond , 2003, Adapt. Behav..

[40]  J. Javůrek [Motor development]. , 1988, Ceskoslovenska pediatrie.

[41]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[42]  Phil Turner,et al.  Designing Interactive Systems: People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies , 2005 .

[43]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[44]  D. Falk Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese? , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  M. Sheets‐Johnstone The Primacy of Movement , 1999 .

[46]  Brenda M Farnell,et al.  Do You See What I Mean?: Plains Indian Sign Talk and the Embodiment of Action , 1995 .

[47]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Physical relation and expression: joint attention for human-robot interaction , 2003, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[48]  Maxine Sheets-Johnstone Response to Crease's review essay: Exploring Animate Form , 2003 .

[49]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[50]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Symbol grounding problem , 1990, Scholarpedia.

[51]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[52]  B. Rogoff The Cultural Nature of Human Development , 2003 .

[53]  Ishiguro Hiroshi,et al.  The Study of Interaction through the Development of Androids , 2004 .

[54]  A. Clark Embodied, Situated, and Distributed Cognition , 1999 .

[55]  Michael Gasser,et al.  The Development of Embodied Cognition: Six Lessons from Babies , 2005, Artificial Life.

[56]  David Lee,et al.  Exploratory studies on social spaces between humans and a mechanical-looking robot , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[57]  A. Clark An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Lewis A. Loren,et al.  Merleau-ponty, Embodied Cognition, and the Problem of Intentionality , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[59]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[60]  Michael L. Anderson Embodied Cognition: A field guide , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[61]  Christine M. Johnson,et al.  Distributed primate cognition: a review , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[62]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[63]  T. Gelder,et al.  Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition , 1995 .

[64]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[65]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  I Could Be You: the Phenomenological Dimension of Social Understanding , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[66]  David I. Anderson,et al.  Travel Broadens the Mind. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.