Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing

Public sector organisations are confronted with growing health and social care needs in combination with severe resource constraints, prompting interest in innovative responses to such challenges. Public service innovation is poorly understood, particularly where innovators must navigate between the norms, practices and logics of public, private and civil society sectors. We contribute to the understanding of how innovating hybrid organisations are able to creatively combine co-existing logics. Case study evidence from newly established social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing services in England is utilised to examine how innovations are shaped by (i) an incumbent state or public sector logic, and two ‘challenger’ logics relating to (ii) the market and increasing competition; and (iii) civil society, emphasising social value and democratic engagement with employees and service users. The analysis shows how a more fluid and creative interplay of logics can be observed in relation to specific strategies and practices. Within organisations, these strategies relate to the empowerment of staff to be creative, financial management, and knowledge sharing and protection. The interplay of logics shaping social innovation is also found in relationships with key stakeholders, notably public sector funders, service users and service delivery partners. Implications are drawn for innovation in public services and hybrid organisations more broadly.

[1]  Aviv Shoham,et al.  PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION FOR EUROPE: A MULTINATIONAL EIGHT‐COUNTRY EXPLORATION OF CITIZENS’ PERSPECTIVES , 2008 .

[2]  Tim Kastelle,et al.  Public sector innovation research: What’s next? , 2010 .

[3]  Andrea Mina,et al.  Hospitals as innovators in the health-care system: A literature review and research agenda , 2016 .

[4]  Ingo Bode Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe , 2006 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  T. Bovaird Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services , 2007 .

[7]  D. Carroll,et al.  Revenue Diversification in Nonprofit Organizations: Does it Lead to Financial Stability? , 2009 .

[8]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  To profit or not to profit : the commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector , 1998 .

[9]  Angela M. Eikenberry,et al.  The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk? , 2004 .

[10]  V. Pestoff Towards a Paradigm of Democratic Participation: Citizen Participation and Co-Production of Personal Social Services in Sweden , 2009 .

[11]  T. Schmitz Nonprofits For Hire The Welfare State In The Age Of Contracting , 2016 .

[12]  L. Rubalcaba,et al.  Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? , 2016 .

[13]  S. Smith,et al.  THEORIZING HYBRIDITY: INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS, COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS, AND ACTOR IDENTITIES: THE CASE OF NONPROFITS , 2014, Public administration.

[14]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Bridging Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Creation of New Organizational Forms: A Multilevel Model , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Richard E. Simmons,et al.  User Involvement in Public Services: ‘Choice about Voice’ , 2012 .

[16]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[17]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications , 2014 .

[18]  V. Bekkers,et al.  Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda , 2015 .

[19]  Julian Le Grand,et al.  Public service mutuals: the next steps , 2012 .

[20]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[21]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process , 2012 .

[22]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector , 2011 .

[23]  T. Reay,et al.  Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics , 2009 .

[24]  Bob Doherty,et al.  Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda , 2014 .

[25]  W. Bartlett,et al.  Quasi-markets and social policy , 1993 .

[26]  Marshall B. Jones The Multiple Sources of Mission Drift , 2007 .

[27]  R. Ziegler Social innovation as a collaborative concept , 2017 .

[28]  S. Borins,et al.  Encouraging innovation in the public sector , 2001 .

[29]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  Handbook of Innovation in Public Services , 2013 .

[30]  Bram Verschuere,et al.  New public governance, the third sector and co-production , 2012 .

[31]  Paul Bate,et al.  Changing the Culture of a Hospital: From Hierarchy to NetworkedCommunity , 2000 .

[32]  A. Nicholls Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies , 2010 .

[33]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  The New Public Governance? 1 , 2006 .

[34]  Michael J. Roy,et al.  Social enterprise: New pathways to health and well-being? , 2012, Journal of Public Health Policy.

[35]  J. Battilana,et al.  Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises , 2014 .

[36]  Fergus Lyon,et al.  Beyond green niches? Growth strategies of environmentally-motivated social enterprises , 2014 .

[37]  Aviv Shoham,et al.  Public sector innovation for the managerial and the post-managerial era: Promises and realities in a globalizing public administration , 2005 .

[38]  Catherine Needham Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services , 2008, Social Policy and Society.

[39]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[40]  Stan Xiao Li,et al.  The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[41]  T. Reay,et al.  The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta , 2005 .

[42]  Martin French,et al.  Organizing the entrepreneurial hospital: Hybridizing the logics of healthcare and innovation , 2016 .

[43]  D. Billis Towards a theory of hybrid organizations , 2010 .

[44]  J. L. Grand,et al.  The Politics of Choice and Competition in Public Services , 2007 .

[45]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[46]  Paul Windrum,et al.  Innovation in public sector services: entrepreneurship, creativity and management , 2008 .

[47]  William G. Resh,et al.  No Solutions, Only Trade-Offs? Evidence about Goal Conflict in Street-Level Bureaucracies , 2013 .

[48]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Social-Business Tensions , 2013 .

[49]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  The Institutional Logics Perspective , 2015 .

[50]  Cemal Karakas Public sector innovation , 2019 .

[51]  E. Weber,et al.  Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[52]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise , 2013, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[53]  Jason T Jay,et al.  Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid Organizations , 2013 .

[54]  W. Seibel Studying Hybrids: Sectors and Mechanisms , 2015 .

[55]  R. Holt,et al.  New Public Management and Cultural Change: The Case of UK Public Sector Project Sponsors as Leaders , 2008 .

[56]  Julie Battilana,et al.  Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises , 2014 .

[57]  R. Millar,et al.  Social enterprise spin-outs from the English health service: a Right to Request but was anyone listening? , 2011 .

[58]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics , 2013 .

[59]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[60]  Chris Huxham,et al.  The Tangled Web: Unraveling the Principle of Common Goals in Collaborations , 2012 .

[61]  B. Townley The Institutional Logic of Performance Appraisal , 1997 .

[62]  Leandro Sepúlveda Social Enterprise – A New Phenomenon in the Field of Economic and Social Welfare? , 2015 .

[63]  Mark Harvey,et al.  Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation , 2003 .

[64]  J. Le Grand Will 1 April mark the beginning of the end of England’s NHS? No , 2013, BMJ.

[65]  R. Simmons Harnessing Social Enterprise for Local Public Services , 2008 .

[66]  Paul Tracey,et al.  Social innovation: a window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating , 2017 .

[67]  Kieron Walsh,et al.  Public Services and Market Mechanisms , 1995 .

[68]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .