Quantifying regulation mechanisms in dating couples through a dynamical systems model of acoustic and physiological arousal

Negative emotional arousal during conflict has been related to negative outcomes in romantic relationships and degraded quality of family life. Despite its extensive study in psychology, it is still challenging to quantify emotional arousal in a meaningful way with objective indices beyond traditionally-used self-reported scores. We examine the association of acoustic and physiological arousal between dating couples through speech prosodic patterns and Electrodermal Activity (EDA) features. We use a dynamical systems model (DSM) approach to capture the interplay of arousal indices within and between people. The DSM parameters reflect the amount of self-regulation with respect to the acoustic and physiological cues within a person, the degree of cross-regulation between the two modalities, as well as the within-couple co-regulation. Our results through statistical analysis and classification experiments indicate a significant association between the estimated system parameters and the participants' self-reported relationship satisfaction measures. This is consistent with previous findings and can help towards better understanding regulation mechanisms and escalation effects of emotional arousal during couples' discussions.

[1]  R. Levenson,et al.  Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: more than a wives' tale. , 2014, Emotion.

[2]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Using physiology and language cues for modeling verbal response latencies of children with ASD , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[3]  David C. Atkins,et al.  Greater emotional arousal predicts poorer long-term memory of communication skills in couples. , 2012, Behaviour research and therapy.

[4]  Diane H Felmlee,et al.  A dynamic systems model of dyadic interaction , 1999 .

[5]  Andrew Christensen,et al.  Translation of Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy to a web-based intervention. , 2013, Family process.

[6]  J. Gross Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Panayiotis G. Georgiou,et al.  Complexity in Prosody: A Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Approach for Dyadic Conversations; Behavior and Outcomes in Couples Therapy , 2016, INTERSPEECH.

[8]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Robust Unsupervised Arousal Rating:A Rule-Based Framework withKnowledge-Inspired Vocal Features , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[9]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Sparse Representation of Electrodermal Activity With Knowledge-Driven Dictionaries , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  K. L. Gratz,et al.  Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale , 2004 .

[11]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[12]  Robert W. Norton,et al.  Measuring marital quality, A critical look at the dependent variable , 1983 .

[13]  Lisa G. Aspinwall,et al.  Emotion Regulation Across the Life Span: An Integrative Perspective Emphasizing Self-Regulation, Positive Affect, and Dyadic Processes , 2003 .

[14]  H. Kelley Personal Relationships: Their Structures and Processes , 1979 .

[15]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  The psychologist as an interlocutor in autism spectrum disorder assessment: insights from a study of spontaneous prosody. , 2014, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  M. Benedek,et al.  Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Matthew R. Sanders,et al.  Self-regulation in behavioral couples' therapy , 1994 .

[18]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  An investigation of vocal arousal dynamics in child-psychologist interactions using synchrony measures and a conversation-based model , 2014, INTERSPEECH.

[19]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  "Rate My Therapist": Automated Detection of Empathy in Drug and Alcohol Counseling via Speech and Language Processing , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  E. Ferrer,et al.  Dynamical systems modeling of physiological coregulation in dyadic interactions. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  Nilam Ram,et al.  Families as Coordinated Symbiotic Systems: Making use of Nonlinear Dynamic Models , 2014 .

[22]  Heidemarie K. Laurent,et al.  Emotion regulation in emerging adult couples: Temperament, attachment, and HPA response to conflict , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[23]  Ross A. Thompson,et al.  Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[24]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Dynamical Systems Modeling of Acoustic and Physiological Arousal in Young Couples , 2016, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[25]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[26]  Kobus Barnard,et al.  Distinguishing emotional coregulation from codysregulation: an investigation of emotional dynamics and body weight in romantic couples. , 2015, Emotion.

[27]  Rahul Gupta,et al.  A language-based generative model framework for behavioral analysis of couples' therapy , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).