Monaural/binaural preferences: effect of hearing aid circuit on speech intelligibility and sound quality.

This investigation compared monaural and binaural hearing aid preferences of 15 adults with mild-to-moderately-severe bilaterally symmetrical sensorineural hearing losses. Subjects listened to connected discourse in quiet and background noise at 70 and 80 dB SPL with K-Amp, linear Class D, linear output limiting compression (OLC), Manhattan II, and linear asymmetrical peak clipping circuits (APC). In Experiment 1, subjects made judgments of sound quality and speech intelligibility in a modified paired-comparison paradigm during which they compared the monaural and binaural fittings of each circuit. In Experiment 2, subjects engaged in subjective ratings on a scale of 0 to 10. Subjects benefitted from improved sound quality and speech intelligibility in high-noise conditions when fit with binaural K-Amp, linear Class D, linear OLC, and Manhattan II circuits. Monaural listening was preferred with the APC circuit. Results indicate that improved sound quality and speech intelligibility may be obtained with binaural fittings of circuits that include high fidelity, low distortion, or increased head-room.

[1]  D N Brooks Binaural benefit--when and how much? , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  J M Bamford,et al.  Evaluation of binaural hearing aids in children using localization and speech intelligibility tasks. , 1981, British journal of audiology.

[3]  D Byrne,et al.  Clinical Issues and Options in Binaural Hearing Aid Fitting , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Brooks Dn,et al.  Survey of binaural hearing aid users. , 1981 .

[5]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M W Skinner,et al.  Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[8]  R CARHART,et al.  Binnaural hearing aids and speech intelligibility. , 1961, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  Hawkins Db,et al.  Comparison of sound quality and clarity with asymmetrical peak clipping and output limiting compression. , 1993 .

[10]  D B Hawkins,et al.  A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[11]  A Gabrielsson,et al.  Perceived sound quality of hearing aids. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[12]  E. Zelnick Comparison of Speech Perception Utilizing Monotic and Dichotic Modes of Listening , 1970 .

[13]  Phillip Dermody,et al.  Localisation of Sound with Binaural Body-Worn Hearing Aids , 1975 .

[14]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E WHETNALL,et al.  Binaural hearing , 1897, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[16]  J M Pickett,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss and upward spread of masking. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  Monaural and binaural intensity discrimination in normal and cochlear-impaired listeners. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Phillip Dermody,et al.  Auditory Localisation by Hearing-Impaired Persons Using Binaural In-The-Ear Hearing Aids , 1975 .

[20]  R M Cox,et al.  Relationship between two measures of aided binaural advantage. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[21]  R CARHART,et al.  A survey of reactions from users of binaural and monaural hearing aids. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[22]  F L Wightman,et al.  Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[23]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[24]  D. Brooks,et al.  Survey of Binaural Hearing Aid Users , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[25]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Effect of Peak Clipping on Speech Recognition Threshold , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[27]  W. Olsen,et al.  Comparison of Monaural and Binaural Hearing Aid Use on a Trial Period Basis , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[28]  S A Erdman,et al.  Subjective Comparisons of Binaural versus Monaural Amplification , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[29]  C. Turner,et al.  Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.