Applying Ragin's Crisp and Fuzzy Set QCA to Large Datasets: Social Class and Educational Achievement in the National Child Development Study

The paper explores the use of Charles Ragin's Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in both its crisp and fuzzy set versions in the study of the relations between social class origin, sex, ‘ability’ and subsequent educational achievement. The work reported is part of a larger ongoing project which is employing QCA to compare these relations within two birth cohorts. Here data are used from the British National Child Development Study, i.e. from children born in 1958. The paper has a methodological focus, bringing out the strengths but also the difficulties that arise when employing QCA with a large dataset of this type. In particular, the problem of calibrating membership in fuzzy sets in a context where detailed case knowledge is not available is illustrated. It is also shown how the use of gradually increasing thresholds with Ragin's fs/QCA software can bring out the relative importance of various factors in accounting for achievement. The QCA-based analysis suggests that the processes of educational attainment can, at best, only be seen as partly falling under a ‘meritocratic’ description. It is also hoped that this paper will serve as a useful introduction to the potential of QCA for readers not yet familiar with it.

[1]  O. F. Cook THE HOME AND THE SCHOOL , 1922 .

[2]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  The Problem of Simplifying Truth Functions , 1952 .

[3]  Michael Young,et al.  The Rise of the Meritocracy , 1958 .

[4]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  The American Occupational Structure , 1967 .

[5]  Raymond Boudon The logic of sociological explanation , 1974 .

[6]  James V. Jucker,et al.  A Response , 1979 .

[7]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain , 1980 .

[8]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Theory and Method in Comparative Research: Two Strategies , 1983 .

[9]  J. Oller,et al.  Consensus and controversy , 1984 .

[10]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[11]  Anthony Heath,et al.  SOCIAL CHANGE AND THE FUTURE OF THE LEFT , 1987 .

[12]  D. Freedman As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis , 1987 .

[13]  S. Lieberson,et al.  Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. , 1987 .

[14]  H. Turner,et al.  The Blackcoated Worker , 1989 .

[15]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases , 1991 .

[16]  G. Marshall,et al.  Social class and social justice , 1993 .

[17]  John H. Goldthorpe,et al.  The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. , 1993 .

[18]  P. Saunders Might Britain be a Meritocracy? , 1995 .

[19]  R. Lampard Might Britain be a Meritocracy? A Comment on Saunders , 1996 .

[20]  G. Marshall,et al.  Merit and Mobility: A Reply to Peter Saunders , 1996 .

[21]  P. Saunders Unequal but fair?: A study of class barriers in Britain , 1996 .

[22]  M. Savage,et al.  Social Mobility, Individual Ability and the Inheritance of Class Inequality , 1997 .

[23]  D. Freedman From Association to Causation via Regression , 1997 .

[24]  P. Saunders Social Mobility in Britain: An Empirical Evaluation of Two Competing Explanations , 1997 .

[25]  P. Hedström,et al.  Social mechanisms : an analytical approach to social theory , 1999 .

[26]  R. Bond,et al.  Routes of success: influences on the occupational attainment of young British males. , 1999, The British journal of sociology.

[27]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Class inequality and meritocracy: a critique of Saunders and an alternative analysis. , 1999, The British journal of sociology.

[28]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[29]  J. Goldthorpe On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory , 2000 .

[30]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Class, Mobility and Merit The Experience of Two British Birth Cohorts , 2001 .

[31]  P. Saunders Reflections on the meritocracy debate in Britain: a response to Richard Breen and John Goldthorpe. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[32]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Merit, mobility and method: another reply to Saunders. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[33]  A. Swift Would Perfect Mobility be Perfect , 2004 .

[34]  Charles C. Ragin 1 From Fuzzy Sets to Crisp Truth Tables , 2005 .

[35]  Gary Goertz,et al.  Assessing the Trivialness, Relevance, and Relative Importance of Necessary or Sufficient Conditions in Social Science , 2006 .