Models of evolution of reproductive isolation.

Mathematical models are presented for the evolution of postmating and premating reproductive isolation. In the case of postmating isolation it is assumed that hybrid sterility or inviability is caused by incompatibility of alleles at one or two loci, and evolution of reproductive isolation occurs by random fixation of different incompatibility alleles in different populations. Mutations are assumed to occur following either the stepwise mutation model or the infinite-allele model. Computer simulations by using Itô's stochastic differential equations have shown that in the model used the reproductive isolation mechanism evolves faster in small populations than in large populations when the mutation rate remains the same. In populations of a given size it evolves faster when the number of loci involved is large than when this is small. In general, however, evolution of isolation mechanisms is a very slow process, and it would take thousands to millions of generations if the mutation rate is of the order of 10(-5) per generation. Since gene substitution occurs as a stochastic process, the time required for the establishment of reproductive isolation has a large variance. Although the average time of evolution of isolation mechanisms is very long, substitution of incompatibility genes in a population occurs rather quickly once it starts. The intrapopulational fertility or viability is always very high. In the model of premating isolation it is assumed that mating preference or compatibility is determined by male- and female-limited characters, each of which is controlled by a single locus with multiple alleles, and mating occurs only when the male and female characters are compatible with each other. Computer simulations have shown that the dynamics of evolution of premating isolation mechanism is very similar to that of postmating isolation mechanism, and the mean and variance of the time required for establishment of premating isolation are very large. Theoretical predictions obtained from the present study about the speed of evolution of reproductive isolation are consistent with empirical data available from vertebrate organisms.

[1]  G. Kilias,et al.  GENETIC STUDIES ON SEXUAL ISOLATION AND HYBRID STERILITY IN LONG‐TERM CAGE POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  Takao K. Watanabe,et al.  GENES AFFECTING COURTSHIP SONG AND MATING PREFERENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, DROSOPHILA SIMULANS AND THEIR HYBRIDS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  M. Nei,et al.  Genetic variability maintained by mutation and overdominant selection in finite populations. , 1981, Genetics.

[4]  H. Paterson The continuing search for the unknown and unknowable: A critique of contemporary ideas on speciation , 1981 .

[5]  P. Hedrick THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CHROMOSOMAL VARIANTS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  E. Zouros The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. , 1981, Genetics.

[7]  J. Felsenstein SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  J. Sved A Two-Sex Polygenic Model for the Evolution of Premating Isolation. II. Computer Simulation of Experimental Selection Procedures. , 1981, Genetics.

[9]  D. Futuyma,et al.  Non-Allopatric Speciation in Animals , 1980 .

[10]  K. Kaneshiro SEXUAL ISOLATION, SPECIATION AND THE DIRECTION OF EVOLUTION , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  J. Powell THE FOUNDER‐FLUSH SPECIATION THEORY: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  W. Li,et al.  Distribution of nucleotide differences between two randomly chosen cistrons in a finite population. , 1977, Genetics.

[13]  M. Nei,et al.  MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION , 1976 .

[14]  A. Wilson,et al.  Two types of molecular evolution. Evidence from studies of interspecific hybridization. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Prakash,et al.  Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. , 1972, Genetics.

[16]  W. Modell Population, Species and Evolution , 1971 .

[17]  H. Carson Speciation and the founder principle , 1971 .

[18]  H. Carson,et al.  Chromosome tracers of the origin of species. , 1970, Science.

[19]  T. Dobzhansky Genetics of the Evolutionary Process , 1970 .

[20]  J. Crow,et al.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION. , 1964, Genetics.

[21]  G. A. Horridge,et al.  Animal species and evolution. , 1964 .

[22]  Sewall Wright,et al.  On the Probability of Fixation of Reciprocal Translocations , 1941, The American Naturalist.

[23]  T. Dobzhansky Speciation as a Stage in Evolutionary Divergence , 1940, The American Naturalist.

[24]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.