Observations on the Optimum Time for Operative Intervention for Aortic Regurgitation: II. Serial Echocardiographic Evaluation of Asymptomatic Patients

A recent echocardiographic study of symptomatic patients who had aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic regurgitation indicated that patients in whom preoperative left ventricular end–systolic dimension (LVD[SYS]) exceeded 55 mm or fractional shortening (%FS) was less than 25% were at high risk of developing congestive heart failure and dying after an otherwise successful operation. Because indices of left ventricular systolic function might identify asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation who might benefit from earlier operation, 37 such patients were evaluated with serial echocardiograms (mean follow–up 34 months). Fourteen patients (38%) subsequently developed symptoms and were recommended for operation (SUBSQ OP). Twenty–three patients (62%) remain asymptomatic during follow–up (NON OP). LVD(SYS) and %FS were the most sensitive measurements for distinguishing on initial examination the patients who subsequently required operation from those who have not (LVD[SYS] 53.0 mm SUBSQ OP vs 44.3 mm NON OP, p = 0.001; %FS 28.8% SUBSQ OP vs 33.9% NON OP,p = 0.002). During serial studies, the maximum rate of change in end–systolic dimension exceeded 7 mm per year in only one patient. Four of five patients (80%) with end–systolic dimension greater than 55 mm developed symptoms and came to operation during a mean follow–up of 39 months. Of the 20 patients whose initial end–systolic dimension was 50 mm or less, only four patients (20%) developed symptoms and required operation, and none died during follow–up. Thus, an asymptomatic patient with aortic regurgitation whose end–systolic dimension is less than 50 mm appears to be at low risk and can be safely followed with echocardiograms at yearly intervals. Asymptomatic patients with end–systolic dimension of 50–54 mm are being followed with serial echocardiograms every 4–6 months. Operation is now being recommended to patients with end–systolic dimensions of 55 mm or greater, even in the absence of symptom.

[1]  N. Schad,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular Function , 1981 .

[2]  J. Ware,et al.  Evaluation of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Valvular Aortic Stenosis , 1980, Circulation.

[3]  R. Bonow,et al.  Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. II. Serial echocardiographic evaluation of asymptomatic patients. , 1980, Circulation.

[4]  J. Ware,et al.  Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects: Evaluation of an adult population without clinically apparent heart disease , 1979, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[5]  W. Gaasch,et al.  Chronic Aortic Regurgitation: The Effect of Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Volume, Mass and Function , 1978, Circulation.

[6]  Michael V. Green,et al.  Exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: assessment with radionuclide cineangiography. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Effects of successful, uncomplicated valve replacement on ventricular hypertrophy, volume, and performance in aortic stenosis and in aortic incompetence. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  J. Ware,et al.  Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Subjects , 1978, Circulation.

[9]  R. Waugh,et al.  Effect of Phasic Respiration on Left Ventricular Dimension and Performance in a Normal Population: An Echocardiographic Study , 1978, Circulation.

[10]  W. LHenry,et al.  Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects. Growth-related changes that occur between infancy and early adulthood. , 1978 .

[11]  J. Copeland,et al.  Long-term follow-up after isolated aortic valve replacement. , 1977, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  D. Stewart,et al.  Left Ventricular Function Before and Following Aortic Valve Replacement , 1977, Circulation.

[13]  R Gorlin,et al.  Cardiac shape and function in aortic valve disease: physiologic and clinical implications. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  M. G. St. John Sutton,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular function after correction of severe aortic regurgitation. , 1976, British heart journal.

[15]  J. Alpert,et al.  Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Severe Aortic Regurgitation , 1976, Circulation.

[16]  I. McDonald Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Aortic Valve Disease , 1976, Circulation.

[17]  A. Selzer Cardiac valve replacement: an unanswered question. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  J. Neutze,et al.  The natural history of rheumatic aortic regurgitation and the indications for surgery. , 1976, British heart journal.

[19]  D. Harrison,et al.  Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation Using Afterload Stress , 1976, Circulation.

[20]  J. Griffith,et al.  Switched Gain - A Technique for Simplifying Ultrasonic Measurement of Cardiac Wall Thickness , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  J. Bristow,et al.  Hemodynamic changes after valve replacement with Starr-Edwards prostheses. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  E. Craige,et al.  Echocardiographic studies of left ventricular wall motion and dimensions after valvular heart surgery. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  R. Wallace,et al.  Long-term follow-up of isolated replacement of the aortic or mitral valve with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  J. Hirshfeld,et al.  Indices Predicting Long‐term Survival after Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation and Patients with Aortic Stenosis , 1974, Circulation.

[25]  B. Pasternack,et al.  Factors Influencing Long‐Term Survival After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement , 1974, Circulation.

[26]  R Gorlin,et al.  Left ventricular ejection fraction as a prognostic guide in surgical treatment of coronary and valvular heart disease. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  A. Selzer,et al.  The natural history of aortic regurgitation. A clinical and hemodynamic study. , 1973, The American journal of medicine.

[28]  W. Henry,et al.  Asymmetric Septal Hypertrophy: Echocardiographic Identification of the Pathognomonic Anatomic Abnormality of IHSS , 1973, Circulation.

[29]  C. Rackley,et al.  Measurement of Left Ventricular Wall Thickness and Mass by Echocardiography , 1972, Circulation.

[30]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[31]  H Sandler,et al.  Relationship Between Changes in Left Ventricular Dimensions and the Ejection Fraction in Man , 1971, Circulation.

[32]  M. Spagnuolo,et al.  Natural History of Rheumatic Aortic Regurgitation: Criteria Predictive of Death, Congestive Heart Failure, and Angina in Young Patients , 1971, Circulation.

[33]  J. Covell,et al.  Left Ventricular Performance Following Correction of Free Aortic Regurgitation , 1970, Circulation.

[34]  D C Harrison,et al.  Ultrasonic Cardiac Echography for Determining Stroke Volume and Valvular Regurgitation , 1970, Circulation.

[35]  H. Dodge,et al.  Left ventricular volume and mass and their significance in heart disease. , 1969, The American journal of cardiology.

[36]  T. Hayton The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 3 , 1968 .

[37]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[38]  E. Bland,et al.  Severe aortic regurgitation in young people; a long-term perspective with reference to prognosis and prosthesis. , 1957, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  J. Segal,et al.  A clinical study of one hundred cases of severe aortic insufficiency. , 1956, The American journal of medicine.