Self-presentation in everyday interactions: effects of target familiarity and gender composition.

This study examined people's self-presentation motives in unstructured, everyday social interaction as a function of participants' gender similarity to, and general familiarity with, the targets of their self-presentations. Participants maintained a variant of the Rochester Interaction Record for 1 week. For every interaction that lasted 10 min or more, they rated the degree to which they wanted to make each of 4 impressions (likable, competent, ethical, and attractive), how much they thought about the impressions others in the interaction formed of them, and how nervous they felt in the interaction. In general, participants' self-presentational motives were lower in interactions with highly familiar people of their own sex than they were either in interactions with less familiar people of their sex or in interactions with people of the other sex regardless of familiarity. When participants' interactions with only their 3 most familiar interactants were examined, self-presentational concerns decreased with familiarity in same-sex interactions but increased with familiarity in cross-sex interactions.

[1]  R. Hays,et al.  The Day-to-Day Functioning of Close versus Casual Friendships , 1989 .

[2]  W. Snell,et al.  Willingness to Self-Disclose to Female and Male Friends as a Function of Social Anxiety and Gender , 1989 .

[3]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-presentations of small group leaders: Effects of role requirements and leadership orientation. , 1986 .

[4]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior , 1975 .

[5]  K. Gergen.  Effects of interaction goals and personality feedback on the presentation of self. , 1965 .

[6]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[8]  H. M. Klein,et al.  Psychological masculinity and femininity and typical and maximal dominance expression in women. , 1979 .

[9]  M. Leary.  Understanding Social Anxiety: Social, Personality, and Clinical Perspectives , 1983 .

[10]  C. Cutrona,et al.  Behavioral manifestations of social support: a microanalytic investigation. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J. Gottman,et al.  Response-acquisition and cognitive self-statement modification approaches to dating-skills training. , 1976 .

[12]  John M. Levine,et al.  Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. , 1989 .

[13]  J. Nezlek.  The stability of social interaction. , 1993 .

[14]  J. Tedeschi.  Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research , 1981 .

[15]  H. Reis.  Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction , 1983 .

[16]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  The effect of nonverbal sensitivity on social interaction , 1990 .

[17]  J. M. Jellison,et al.  A Self-Presentation Interpretation of the Seeking of Social Approval , 1978 .

[18]  Michael R. Cunningham,et al.  Support Seeking in Personal Relationships , 1990 .

[19]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[20]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Looking Tough: The Negotiator Under Constituent Surveillance , 1979 .

[21]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Self-presentation: managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  K. Deaux,et al.  Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. , 1987 .

[23]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[24]  E. E. Jones,et al.  When Self-Presentation is Constrained by the Target's Knowledge: Consistency and Compensation. , 1978 .

[25]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[26]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[27]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  John B. Nezlek,et al.  Sex differences in social participation , 1977 .

[30]  B. Maher,et al.  Progress in experimental personality research , 1964 .

[31]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[32]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological perspectives on the self , 1982 .

[33]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Impression Management in the Job Interview , 1981 .

[34]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self‐esteem, self‐presentation, and future Interaction: A dilemma of reputation , 1982 .

[35]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Studying social interaction with the Rochester interaction record , 1991 .

[36]  H. Reis,et al.  On Mediating Equity, Equality, and Self-Interest: The Role of Self-Presentation in Social Exchange. , 1976 .

[37]  N. Cliff,et al.  Adverbs as multipliers. , 1959, Psychological review.