Technology in Paralympic sport: performance enhancement or essential for performance?

Background People with disabilities often depend on assistive devices to enable activities of daily living as well as to compete in sport. Technological developments in sport can be controversial. Objectives To review, identify and describe current technological developments in assistive devices used in the summer Paralympic Games; and to prepare for the London 2012 Games, the future challenges and the role of technology are debated. Methods A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature and personal observations of technological developments at the Athens (2004) and Beijing (2008) Paralympic Games was conducted. Results Standard assistive devices can inhibit the Paralympians’ abilities to perform the strenuous activities of their sports. Although many Paralympic sports only require technology similar to their Olympic counterparts, several unique technological modifications have been made in prosthetic and wheelchair devices. Technology is essential for the Paralympic athlete, and the potential technological advantage for a Paralympian, when competing against an Olympian, is unclear. Conclusion Technology must match the individual requirements of the athlete with the sport in order for Paralympians to safely maximise their performance. Within the ‘performance enhancement or essential for performance?’ debate, any potential increase in mechanical performance from an assistive device must be considered holistically with the compensatory consequences the disability creates. To avoid potential technology controversies at the 2012 London Olympic and Paralympic Games, the role of technology in sport must be clarified.

[1]  S. Tweedy,et al.  Biomechanical Consequences of Impairment: A Taxonomically Valid Basis for Classification in a Unified Disability Athletics System , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[2]  S. Camporesi,et al.  Oscar Pistorius, enhancement and post-humans , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[3]  K. Gilbert,et al.  The Paralympic Games : empowerment or side show? , 2008 .

[4]  Stefan Vogt,et al.  Power output during stage racing in professional road cycling. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  D. Shurr,et al.  The effects of prosthetic foot design on physiologic measurements, self-selected walking velocity, and physical activity in people with transtibial amputation. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  A. Lees,et al.  The functional demands on the intact limb during walking for active transfemoral and transtibial amputees , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  L. Landeweerd,et al.  Disability or Extraordinary Talent—Francesco Lentini (Three Legs) Versus Oscar Pistorius (No Legs) , 2008 .

[8]  V L Goosey,et al.  Effect of push frequency on the economy of wheelchair racers. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Cassie Wilson,et al.  Defining advantage and athletic performance: The case of Oscar Pistorius , 2009 .

[10]  Mary Beth Brown,et al.  Running-specific prostheses permit energy cost similar to nonamputees. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Corcoran Pj,et al.  Sports for the disabled: the evolution from rehabilitation to competitive sport. , 1996, British journal of sports medicine.

[12]  Yagesh Bhambhani,et al.  Physiology of Wheelchair Racing in Athletes with Spinal Cord Injury , 2002, Sports medicine.

[13]  S. Edwards.  Should Oscar Pistorius be Excluded from the 2008 Olympic Games? , 2008, The Ethics of Sports Technologies and Human Enhancement.

[14]  J Smeathers,et al.  Walking and running inter-limb asymmetry for Paralympic trans-femoral amputees, a biomechanical analysis , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[15]  Adamantios Arampatzis,et al.  Biomechanics of double transtibial amputee sprinting using dedicated sprinting prostheses , 2008 .

[16]  Martin Henriksson,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of C-leg compared with non-microprocessor-controlled knees: a modeling approach. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Alison O'Riordan,et al.  Shot trajectory parameters in gold medal stationary shot-putters during world-class competition. , 2007, Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ.

[18]  Mark Huang,et al.  Advances in amputee care. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  H J Stam,et al.  Physical capacity in wheelchair-dependent persons with a spinal cord injury: a critical review of the literature , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[20]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Pistorius ineligible for the Olympic Games: the right decision , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[21]  L. Romer,et al.  Effect of pedaling technique on mechanical effectiveness and efficiency in cyclists. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  Adrian Lees,et al.  The influence of lower limb amputation level on the approach in the amputee long jump , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[23]  Philippe Gorce,et al.  The effects of rear-wheel camber on the mechanical parameters produced during the wheelchair sprinting of handibasketball athletes. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[24]  Bert Steenbergen,et al.  Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning. , 2006, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[25]  Brendan Burkett,et al.  A computer model to simulate the swing phase of a transfemoral prosthesis , 2004 .

[26]  Magnus Lilja,et al.  Lower extremity leg amputation: An advantage in running? , 2008 .

[27]  B. Burkett,et al.  Sport Science and Coaching in Paralympic Cycling , 2008 .

[28]  Daniel J. Cipriani,et al.  Effect of pedaling technique on muscle activity and cycling efficiency , 2007, European Journal of Applied Physiology.