Why Does Binding of Proteins to DNA or Proteins to Proteins Not Necessarily Spell Function?

Studies of binding are often question: first, is the observed binding functional, and second, if it is, which function? Is it activation or repression? The first question relates to binding at different sites; the second relates to binding at similar sites. These questions apply to transcription factors binding to genomic DNA and to protein interaction domains binding to their partners. Here, we explain that both can be understood in terms of allostery and the cellular (or in vitro) environment. The idea is simple yet powerful; it emphasizes the role of allostery in defining whether binding between transcription factors and (cognate or noncognate) DNA sequences will lead to function and to the type of function. Allosteric effects are the outcome of dynamically shifting populations; thus binding to even slightly different DNA sequences will lead to different transcription factor conformations that can be reflected in the binding sites to their co-regulators. Currently, allostery is not considered when trying to understand how binding phenomena determine the functional outcome. Allosteric effects can enhance the binding specificity in a function-oriented manner. Here we provide a biological rationale that considers cellular crowding effects.

[1]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Allosteric control of ligand selectivity between estrogen receptors alpha and beta: implications for other nuclear receptors. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[2]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[3]  W. Greenleaf,et al.  High-resolution, single-molecule measurements of biomolecular motion. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[4]  Cristian Micheletti,et al.  Small- and large-scale conformational changes of adenylate kinase: a molecular dynamics study of the subdomain motion and mechanics. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[5]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[6]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[7]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners? , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Paul Flicek,et al.  Functional diversity for REST (NRSF) is defined by in vivo binding affinity hierarchies at the DNA sequence level. , 2009, Genome research.

[10]  F. He,et al.  KRAB-type zinc-finger protein Apak specifically regulates p53-dependent apoptosis , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Mechanisms of transcription factor selectivity. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  Erich Bornberg-Bauer,et al.  A structural model of latent evolutionary potentials underlying neutral networks in proteins. , 2007, HFSP journal.

[13]  Teizo Kitagawa,et al.  Primary protein response after ligand photodissociation in carbonmonoxy myoglobin , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Design of protein-interaction specificity affords selective bZIP-binding peptides , 2009, Nature.

[15]  Myles Brown,et al.  Advances in estrogen receptor biology: prospects for improvements in targeted breast cancer therapy , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[17]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[18]  J. Mitchison Cell Biology , 1964, Nature.

[19]  J. Chu,et al.  Illuminating the mechanistic roles of enzyme conformational dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Latent evolutionary potentials under the neutral mutational drift of an enzyme. , 2007, HFSP journal.

[21]  X. Lu,et al.  Structure activity relationships and differential interactions and functional activity of various equine estrogens mediated via estrogen receptors (ERs) ERalpha and ERbeta. , 2008, Endocrinology.

[22]  Jianyun Lu,et al.  The effect of antagonists on the conformational exchange of the retinoid X receptor alpha ligand‐binding domain , 2009, Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC.

[23]  T. Pawson,et al.  Reading protein modifications with interaction domains , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[24]  A. Palmer,et al.  Nmr probes of molecular dynamics: overview and comparison with other techniques. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[25]  Jiunn R Chen,et al.  PDZ Domain Binding Selectivity Is Optimized Across the Mouse Proteome , 2007, Science.

[26]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Insights into enzyme structure and dynamics elucidated by amide H/D exchange mass spectrometry. , 2005, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[27]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.

[28]  D. Friedmann,et al.  RAM-induced Allostery Facilitates Assembly of a Notch Pathway Active Transcription Complex* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  D. McDonnell,et al.  Coregulators in nuclear estrogen receptor action: from concept to therapeutic targeting. , 2005, Molecular interventions.

[31]  William Bourguet,et al.  Allosteric Effects Govern Nuclear Receptor Action: DNA Appears as a Player , 2009, Science Signaling.

[32]  Stefan Knapp,et al.  Structure of the SOCS4-ElonginB/C Complex Reveals a Distinct SOCS Box Interface and the Molecular Basis for SOCS-Dependent EGFR Degradation , 2007, Structure.

[33]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[34]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  DNA Binding Site Sequence Directs Glucocorticoid Receptor Structure and Activity , 2009, Science.

[35]  K. Dill,et al.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[37]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Rapid Evolution of Functional Complexity in a Domain Family , 2009, Science Signaling.

[38]  Y. Dufrêne,et al.  Detection and localization of single molecular recognition events using atomic force microscopy , 2006, Nature Methods.

[39]  R. Milo,et al.  Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  D. Boehr,et al.  How Do Proteins Interact? , 2008, Science.

[41]  T. Kenakin Seven Transmembrane Receptors as Nature's Prototype Allosteric Protein: De-emphasizing the Geography of Binding , 2008, Molecular Pharmacology.

[42]  K A Dill,et al.  Ligand binding to proteins: The binding landscape model , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[43]  Charalampos G. Kalodimos,et al.  Dynamic activation of an allosteric regulatory protein , 2009, Nature.

[44]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins. , 2000, Science.

[45]  F. Parak,et al.  Proteins in action: the physics of structural fluctuations and conformational changes. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  K. Makova,et al.  Coding region structural heterogeneity and turnover of transcription start sites contribute to divergence in expression between duplicate genes , 2009, Genome Biology.

[47]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Energetic determinants of protein binding specificity: Insights into protein interaction networks , 2009, Proteomics.

[48]  M. Chance,et al.  Structural Allostery and Binding of the Transferrin·Receptor Complex*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[49]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Structured disorder and conformational selection , 2001, Proteins.

[50]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[52]  D. Koshland Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Zbigniew Dauter,et al.  Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor , 1997, Nature.

[54]  R D Young,et al.  Protein states and proteinquakes. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[56]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein allostery, signal transmission and dynamics: a classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.