Lag Sequential Analysis as a Tool for Functional Analysis of Student Disruptive Behavior in Classrooms

Lag sequential analysis of individual interactions was explored as a tool to generate hypotheses regarding the social control of inappropriate classroom behavior of students with severe behavior disorders. Four single subject experiments with two students who displayed high rates of disruptive behavior in special education classrooms were completed using lag sequential analysis to identify antecedent and subsequent social events that were significantly related to their disruptive behavior. Three coded events (student handraise, teacher attention, and the “stop code”) were identified as highly related to the students' disruptive behavior. Three of the four experiments were successful in reducing the students' disruptive behavior by prescribing treatment based upon the lag sequential analysis. The results of these experiments indicated that the lag sequential analysis procedure is potentially a useful tool, but additional research is needed. The results are discussed in terms of the usefulness of the analysis procedures in contributing to the functional analysis of students' classroom behavior.

[1]  R. Shores,et al.  Overview of Research on Social Interaction: A Historical and Personal Perspective , 1987 .

[2]  T. Ayllon,et al.  Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  Philip Smith.  Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  R. Simpson,et al.  Teacher-Pupil and Peer Verbal Interactions of Learning Disabled, Behavior-Disordered, and Nonhandicapped Students , 1983 .

[5]  A. Repp,et al.  Reducing inappropriate classroom behaviour of retarded students through three procedures of differential reinforcement. , 2008, Journal of mental deficiency research.

[6]  R. Shores,et al.  Classroom Management Strategies: Are They Setting Events for Coercion? , 1993 .

[7]  J. Reid.  Altruism and aggression: Social-interactional patterns in families of abused and nonabused children , 1986 .

[8]  R. Gaylord-Ross,et al.  Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  B. Iwata,et al.  The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders: Methodology, applications, and limitations. , 1990 .

[10]  J. Hendrickson,et al.  Social Interactions of Normal Preschool Children , 1981 .

[11]  J. S. Handleman,et al.  Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities , 1992 .

[12]  A. Repp,et al.  Reinforcement-based reductive procedures: training and monitoring performance of institutional staff. , 1979, Mental Retardation.

[13]  G. Patterson,et al.  The effects of consequences on patterns of social interaction: a quasi-experimental approach to reinforcement in natural interaction. , 1986, Child development.

[14]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  The Strategic Use of Parallel Play: A Sequential Analysis. , 1980 .

[15]  R. Shores,et al.  Classroom Interactions of Children with Behavior Disorders , 1993 .

[16]  A. Repp,et al.  Reducing inappropriate behaviors in classrooms and in individual sessions through DRO schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Mental retardation.

[17]  R. Simpson,et al.  Reciprocity in the Pupil-Teacher Interactions of Autistic and Mildly Handicapped Preschool Children , 1988 .