Editor’s Choice-Rule-in of acute myocardial infarction: Focus on troponin

It is important to establish the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) expeditiously so that an immediate treatment plan can be developed. However, rapidly diagnosing AMI is challenging because patients with possible AMI constitute a heterogeneous group. Many of these patients will have increased cardiac troponin (cTn) levels in the absence of AMI, especially with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays.1,2 Furthermore, although chest pain represents the most common presenting symptom, up to 40% of patients with non-ST segment elevation AMI present with dyspnoea or other non-specific symptoms.3 The term ‘high-sensitivity’ reflects the assay’s characteristics and two criteria have been proposed to define an hs-cTn assay: (a) the total imprecision at the 99th percentile should be ≤10% and (b) measurable concentrations above the assay’s limit of detection and below the 99th percentile should be attainable for at least 50% of healthy people.4 Novel rule-in strategies have recently been developed based on the use of hs-cTn assays and taking advantage of their increased analytical sensitivity and precision. The aim of this review is to provide a condensed summary of the key characteristics and performance measures of these strategies, including some important limitations, so physicians can select and apply the strategy that best suits their local needs.

[1]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Two-Hour Algorithm for Triage toward Rule-Out and Rule-In of Acute Myocardial Infarction by Use of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Sex-specific versus overall cut points for a high sensitivity troponin I assay in predicting 1-year outcomes in emergency patients presenting with chest pain , 2016, Heart.

[3]  K. Rentsch,et al.  One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. , 2016, American heart journal.

[4]  Baris Gencer,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2011 .

[5]  K. Rentsch,et al.  Early rule-out and rule-in of myocardial infarction using sensitive cardiac Troponin I. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  Ò. Miró,et al.  Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay , 2015, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  R. Somasundaram,et al.  Sex differences of troponin test performance in chest pain patients. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  J. Greenslade,et al.  Two-hour algorithm for triage toward rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. , 2015, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  P. Collinson,et al.  High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  A. Jaffe,et al.  In search for the Holy Grail: Suggestions for studies to define delta changes to diagnose or exclude acute myocardial infarction: a position paper from the study group on biomarkers of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association , 2014, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[11]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Using high-sensitivity troponin T: the importance of the proper gold standard. , 2013, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  L. Lind,et al.  Factors influencing the 99th percentile of cardiac troponin I evaluated in community-dwelling individuals at 70 and 75 years of age. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  R. Somasundaram,et al.  Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The Charité Emergency Medicine Study (CHARITEM) , 2013, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[14]  H. Katus,et al.  Effect of older age on diagnostic and prognostic performance of high-sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting to an emergency department. , 2012, American heart journal.

[15]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2012 .

[16]  C. Schindler,et al.  One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  J. Alpert,et al.  How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care , 2012 .

[18]  F. Apple,et al.  Delta changes for optimizing clinical specificity and 60-day risk of adverse events in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome utilizing the ADVIA Centaur TnI-Ultra assay. , 2012, Clinical biochemistry.

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2012 .

[20]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[21]  Hugo A Katus,et al.  Absolute and relative kinetic changes of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in acute coronary syndrome and in patients with increased troponin in the absence of acute coronary syndrome. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[22]  S. Blankenberg,et al.  Serial changes in highly sensitive troponin I assay and early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. , 2011, JAMA.

[23]  T. Lauer,et al.  Kardiologische Aspekte der präoperativen Risikostratifizierung , 2011 .

[24]  H. Katus,et al.  High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for early prediction of evolving non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and negative troponin results on admission. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[25]  Waqas Aftab,et al.  Frequency of elevated troponin I and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.