Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels

Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Navy destroyer DDG-81 to explore the problem. Both active and passive flow control techniques were used to improve the flow field in the helicopter's final decent onto the flight deck. Data were collected at a set of grid points using a single component hotwire. Results show that the use of porous surfaces decreases the unsteadiness of the flow field. Further improvements are found by injecting air through these porous surfaces, causing a reduction in unsteadiness in the landing region of 6.6% at 0 degrees wind-over- deck (WOD) and 8.3% at 20 degrees WOD. Other passive configurations tested include fences placed around the hangar deck edges which move the unsteady shear layer away from the flight deck. Although these devices cause an increase in unsteadiness downstream of the edge of the fence when compared to the baseline, the reticulated foam fence caused an overall decrease in unsteadiness in the landing region of 12.1% at 20 degrees WOD.

[1]  S. Polsky CFD Prediction of Airwake Flowfields for Ships Experiencing Beam Winds , 2003 .

[2]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing - second edition , 1984 .

[3]  Jonathan Morrison,et al.  Passive Control of Pressure Fluctuations Generated by Separated Flow , 1998 .

[4]  Roger L. Simpson,et al.  Turbulent Boundary-Layer Separation , 1989 .

[5]  Steven J. Zan,et al.  Wind tunnel testing of a helicopter fuselage and rotor in a ship airwake , 2005 .

[6]  Michael K. Johns Flow visualization of the airwake around a model of a DD-963 class destroyer in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer , 1988 .

[7]  Monica A. Walker,et al.  UNSTEADY ANALYSIS OF THE AIR WAKE OVER THE LPD-17 , 2000 .

[8]  Steven J. Zan,et al.  Unsteady Aerodynamic Loading on a Helicopter Fuselage in a Ship Airwake , 2002 .

[9]  John C. Davis,et al.  Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data , 1992 .

[10]  Susan Polsky,et al.  A Computational Study of Unsteady Ship Airwake , 2002 .

[11]  H. L. Seegmiller,et al.  Time-dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer , 1987 .

[12]  Lyle N. Long,et al.  AIRWAKE SIMULATIONS ON AN LPD 17 SHIP , 2001 .

[13]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[14]  H. H. Bruun Hot-wire anemometry , 1995 .

[15]  J. Val. Healey The prospects for simulating the helicopter/ship interface , 1987 .

[16]  Veer N. Vatsa,et al.  Improved Treatment of External Boundary Conditions for Three-Dimensional Flow Computations , 1998 .

[17]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[18]  Steven W. Smith,et al.  The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing , 1997 .

[19]  Mark M. Rhoades A study of the airwake aerodynamics over the flight deck of an AOR model ship , 1990 .

[20]  S. J. Zan Experimental Determination of Rotor Thrust in a Ship Airwake , 2002 .

[21]  J. V. Healey,et al.  Flight deck aerodynamics of a nonaviation ship , 1992 .

[22]  Marshall L. Narveson Flow Modification Over a Backward Facing Step , 1990 .

[23]  R Nangia,et al.  Novel Vortex Flow Devices - Columnar Vortex Generators Studies for Airwakes , 2004 .

[24]  John W. Bunnell,et al.  AN INTEGRATED TIME-VARYING AIRWAKE IN A UH-60 BLACK HAWK SHIPBOARD LANDING SIMULATION , 2001 .

[25]  Gustav A. Anderson Mapping the Airwake of a Model DD-963 Along Specific Helicopter Flight Paths , 1989 .

[26]  William Volk,et al.  Applied statistics for engineers , 1971 .

[27]  Subrata Bhattacharjee,et al.  Modification of vortex interactions in a reattaching separated flow , 1985 .

[28]  John L. Biskaduros Flow Visualization of the Airwake of an Oscillating Generic Ship Model , 1987 .

[29]  I. P. Castro,et al.  The structure of a turbulent shear layer bounding a separation region , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Fenguangzhai Song CD , 1992 .

[31]  Duane T. McRUER,et al.  Interdisciplinary interactions and dynamic systems integration , 1994 .

[32]  Susan Polsky,et al.  Time-accurate computational simulations of an LHA ship airwake , 2000 .

[33]  John K. Eaton,et al.  A Review of Research on Subsonic Turbulent Flow Reattachment , 1981 .

[34]  H. S. Govinda Ram,et al.  An experimental investigation of flow fields downstream of solid and porous fences , 1997 .

[35]  H. L. Seegmiller,et al.  Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channel flow , 1985 .

[36]  Gaetano Iuso,et al.  Flow control downstream of a backward facing step , 2000 .

[37]  H. H. Fernholz,et al.  An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  J. V. Healey Control of Flow Over a Backward Facing Step , 1990 .