Matter-wave interference of particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10,000 amu.

The quantum superposition principle, a key distinction between quantum physics and classical mechanics, is often perceived as a philosophical challenge to our concepts of reality, locality or space-time since it contrasts with our intuitive expectations with experimental observations on isolated quantum systems. While we are used to associating the notion of localization with massive bodies, quantum physics teaches us that every individual object is associated with a wave function that may eventually delocalize by far more than the body's own extension. Numerous experiments have verified this concept at the microscopic scale but intuition wavers when it comes to delocalization experiments with complex objects. While quantum science is the uncontested ideal of a physical theory, one may ask if the superposition principle can persist on all complexity scales. This motivates matter-wave diffraction and interference studies with large compounds in a three-grating interferometer configuration which also necessitates the preparation of high-mass nanoparticle beams at low velocities. Here we demonstrate how synthetic chemistry allows us to prepare libraries of fluorous porphyrins which can be tailored to exhibit high mass, good thermal stability and relatively low polarizability, which allows us to form slow thermal beams of these high-mass compounds, which can be detected using electron ionization mass spectrometry. We present successful superposition experiments with selected species from these molecular libraries in a quantum interferometer, which utilizes the diffraction of matter-waves at an optical phase grating. We observe high-contrast quantum fringe patterns of molecules exceeding a mass of 10,000 amu and having 810 atoms in a single particle.

[1]  S. Gerlich,et al.  Theory and experimental verification of Kapitza–Dirac–Talbot–Lau interferometry , 2009, 0902.0234.

[2]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[3]  S. Gerlich,et al.  Electric moments in molecule interferometry , 2011 .

[4]  M. Arndt,et al.  UV-VIS absorption spectroscopy of large molecules for applications in matter wave interferometry , 2007 .

[5]  N. Doltsinis,et al.  Influence of conformational molecular dynamics on matter wave interferometry , 2010, 1405.4649.

[6]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator , 2010, Nature.

[7]  L. Brown Dirac ’ s The Principles of Quantum Mechanics * , 2006 .

[8]  S. Gerlich,et al.  Matter-wave metrology as a complementary tool for mass spectrometry. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[9]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules , 1999, Nature.

[10]  James M. Dixon,et al.  PhotochemCAD 2: A Refined Program with Accompanying Spectral Databases for Photochemical Calculations¶ , 2005, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[11]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Experimental verification of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for fullerene molecules , 2001, quant-ph/0105061.

[12]  R. E. Richardson,et al.  Vapor pressure and intramolecular hydrogen bonding in fluorotelomer alcohols. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[13]  Orlando,et al.  Josephson Persistent-Current Qubit , 2022 .

[14]  강희정,et al.  17 , 1995, The Hatak Witches.

[15]  A. Stefanov,et al.  Polarizability measurements of a molecule via a near-field matter-wave interferometer , 2007, quant-ph/0701179.

[16]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Concepts for near-field interferometers with large molecules , 2003 .

[17]  P. Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1982 .

[18]  S. Mabury,et al.  Vapor pressures of the fluorinated telomer alcohols--limitations of estimation methods. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  M. Handzic 5 , 1824, The Banality of Heidegger.

[20]  A. Miffre,et al.  Atom interferometry , 2006, quant-ph/0605055.

[21]  최인후,et al.  13 , 1794, Tao te Ching.

[22]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Decoherence of matter waves by thermal emission of radiation , 2004, Nature.

[23]  A. Major,et al.  Slow beams of massive molecules , 2007, 0708.1449.

[24]  M. Arndt,et al.  A universal matter-wave interferometer with optical ionization gratings in the time-domain , 2013, Nature Physics.

[25]  J. Clauser,et al.  Generalized Talbot-Lau Atom Interferometry , 1997 .

[26]  Angelo Bassi,et al.  Models of Wave-function Collapse, Underlying Theories, and Experimental Tests , 2012, 1204.4325.

[27]  46 , 2015, Slow Burn.

[28]  P. Parseval,et al.  Structure of the { 001 } talc surface as seen by atomic force 1 microscopy : Comparison with X-ray and electron diffraction 2 results 3 4 , 2006 .

[29]  P. Steerenberg,et al.  Targeting pathophysiological rhythms: prednisone chronotherapy shows sustained efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[30]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Quantum interference experiments with large molecules , 2003 .

[31]  J. H. Green,et al.  ELECTRON‐IMPACT MASS SPECTROMETRY OF PORPHYRIN SYSTEMS , 1973, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  47 , 2014, Fetch the Devil.

[33]  Real-time single-molecule imaging of quantum interference. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[34]  A. Savranlar,et al.  206 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? , 2005 .

[35]  C. Wieman,et al.  Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor , 1995, Science.

[36]  Marcel Mayor,et al.  Quantum interference distinguishes between constitutional isomers. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[37]  Marcel Mayor,et al.  Quantum interference of large organic molecules , 2011, Nature communications.

[38]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Decoherence in a Talbot–Lau interferometer: the influence of molecular scattering , 2003, quant-ph/0307238.

[39]  S. Gerlich,et al.  A Kapitza–Dirac–Talbot–Lau interferometer for highly polarizable molecules , 2007, 0802.3287.