A Preliminary Evaluation of a Pedometer-Assessed Physical Activity Self-Monitoring Survey

This study is the preliminary evaluation of acceptability and feasibility of physical activity self-monitoring survey by pedometer. The authors recruited 375 people from a possible 1,200 who completed a randomized, population-based telephone survey administered in 2001 to individuals living in Sumter Co3unty, South Carolina. Mailed kits included pedometer, instructions, a recording calendar, and a postage-paid return envelope. Participants wore the pedometer during waking hours and recorded day-end steps taken for seven days. Up to three telephone prompts were made to get participants to return data. Despite the limitations of initial recruitment, this study provides preliminary information on the acceptability and feasibility of a pedometer-assessed physical activity self-monitoring survey.

[1]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  How Many Steps/Day Are Enough? , 2004, Sports medicine.

[2]  F Vinicor,et al.  The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. , 2001, JAMA.

[3]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Accuracy of recall of occupational physical activity by questionnaire. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Pedometer-determined ambulatory activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[5]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. , 2002, Sports medicine.

[6]  D. Bassett Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[7]  Michael Pratt,et al.  Levels of physical activity and inactivity in children and adults in the United States: current evidence and research issues. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  The Prevalence of Leisure-Time Physical Activity Among Diabetics in South Carolina , 2004, Southern medical journal.

[9]  T. Perneger,et al.  Collecting saliva samples by mail. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Measuring Physical Activity in Sedentary Adults , 2001, Sports medicine.

[11]  M. Pratt,et al.  Cost analysis of the built environment: the case of bike and pedestrian trials in Lincoln, Neb. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[12]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Considerations for Physical Activity Research: Variations on a Theme , 2004 .

[13]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[14]  Dawn K. Wilson,et al.  Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[15]  Y Schutz,et al.  Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Accuracy of the College Alumnus Physical Activity Questionnaire. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  A. Manley Physical Activity And Health: A Report Of The Surgeon General , 2004 .

[18]  Anita M. Myers,et al.  Methodological Considerations for Researchers and Practitioners Using Pedometers to Measure Physical (Ambulatory) Activity , 2001, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[19]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Lewis H Kuller,et al.  Development of Questionnaire to Examine Relationship of Physical Activity and Diabetes in Pima Indians , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[21]  Physical activity trends--United States, 1990-1998. , 2001, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[22]  K R Westerterp,et al.  Assessment of physical activity level in relation to obesity: current evidence and research issues. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  H. Nagaraja,et al.  Evaluation of methods to assess physical activity in free-living conditions. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  J. Sallis,et al.  Self-report measures and scoring protocols affect prevalence estimates of meeting physical activity guidelines. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.