Where to Grasp a Tool? Task-Dependent Adjustments of Tool Transformations by Tool Users

Biomechanical and environmental constraints limit body movements and tool use actions. However, in the case of tool use, such constraints can often be overcome by adjusting a tool's tool transformation to the requirements of the intended tool use action. The research presented here examined whether participants grasped a lever at different positions, thus modifying the lever's tool transformation, to accommodate speed and accuracy requirements of different tasks. Participants were asked to quickly track a sequence of targets with the lever. If accuracy requirements were high, participants compensated for limits in the accuracy of hand movements by grasping the lever at a position that enabled precise control of the lever. If accuracy requirements were low, participants compensated for limits in hand speed by grasping the lever at a position that enabled fast lever movements with comparatively slow hand movements. This task-dependent grasp selection was only present after participants had practiced the tasks. The data show that in addition to adapting to fixed tool transformations, participants also actively controlled tool transformations to facilitate tool use actions.

[1]  Martin Volker Butz,et al.  Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  Emergent Effector-Independent Internal Spaces: Adaptation and Intermanual Learning Transfer in Humans and Neural Networks , 2007, 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[3]  R. Schmidt,et al.  VARIABILITY OF PRACTICE AND IMPLICIT MOTOR LEARNING , 1997 .

[4]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[5]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  O. Bock,et al.  Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: different mechanisms for small versus large rotations , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  N. Berthier.  Learning to reach: A mathematical model. , 1996 .

[10]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Transfer of sensorimotor adaptation between different movement categories , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  W. Prinz,et al.  Programming tool-use actions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  E. R. F. W. Grossman,et al.  The Information-Capacity of the Human Motor-System in Pursuit Tracking , 1960 .

[14]  D. Rosenbaum.  Reaching while walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination during Learning of a Novel Visuomotor Task , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: simple approximations of complex transformations , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Tao Xiong,et al.  A combined SVM and LDA approach for classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2005..

[20]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Frank Marchak,et al.  Constraints for Action Selection: Overhand Versus Underhand Grips , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[22]  J. Krakauer,et al.  An Implicit Plan Overrides an Explicit Strategy during Visuomotor Adaptation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Functional independence of explicit and implicit motor adjustments , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[24]  Martin Volker Butz,et al.  The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases , 2012, Psychological research.

[25]  S. Coren.  The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults , 1993 .

[26]  M. Landy,et al.  Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[27]  R. Cohen,et al.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.