The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways. Reversals of preference are demonstrated in choices regarding monetary outcomes, both hypothetical and real, and in questions pertaining to the loss of human lives. The effects of frames on preferences are compared to the effects of perspectives on perceptual appearance. The dependence of preferences on the formulation of decision problems is a significant concern for the theory of rational choice.

[1]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[2]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[3]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[4]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[5]  R. H. Strotz Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization , 1955 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[8]  W. Mcglothlin Stability of choices among uncertain alternatives. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[10]  William Fellner,et al.  Probability and profit : a study of economic behavior along Bayesian lines , 1966 .

[11]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Importance of variance preferences in gambling decisions , 1968 .

[12]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. 1968. , 1969, M.D.Computing.

[13]  Amia Lieblich,et al.  Effects of Different Payoff Matrices on Arithmetical Estimation Tasks: An Attempt to Produce “Rationality” , 1969 .

[14]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[15]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[16]  John W. Payne,et al.  Preferences among gambles with equal underlying distributions , 1971 .

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[18]  E. Galanter,et al.  Cross Modality Matching of Money against Other Continua. , 1974 .

[19]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Sensation and Measurement , 1974, Springer Netherlands.

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  G. Ainslie Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[24]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[25]  H. Kunreuther Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons , 1978 .

[26]  J. March Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice , 1979 .

[27]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[30]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior , 1979 .

[31]  G. Shafer,et al.  Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. , 1982 .

[32]  J. Elster Ulysses And The Sirens , 1979 .

[33]  David A. Wise,et al.  Price Differences in almost Competitive Markets , 1979 .

[34]  K. MacCrimmon,et al.  Utility Theory: Axioms Versus ‘Paradoxes’ , 1979 .

[35]  P. Fishburn,et al.  TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS* , 1979 .

[36]  D. M. Grether,et al.  Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic , 1980 .

[37]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses: An Expected Utility Analysis , 1980 .

[38]  John W. Payne,et al.  Translation of Gambles and Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior , 1980 .

[39]  Roy L. Crum,et al.  Managerial Risk Preferences for Below-Target Returns , 1980 .

[40]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[41]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[42]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[43]  H. Sox,et al.  Assessment of Patients' Preferences for Therapeutic Outcomes , 1981, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[44]  R. Thaler,et al.  An Economic Theory of Self-Control , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[45]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[46]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .