Application of Joint Notch Filtering and Wavelet Transform for Enhanced Powerline Interference Removal in Atrial Fibrillation Electrograms

Analysis of intra-atrial electrograms (EGMs) nowadays constitutes the most common way to gain new insights about the mechanisms triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these recordings are highly contaminated by powerline interference (PLI) due to the large amount of electrical devices operating simultaneously in the electrophysiology laboratory. To remove this perturbation, conventional notch filtering has been widely used. However, this method adds artificial fractionation to the EGMs, thus concealing their accurate interpretation. Hence, the development of novel algorithms for PLI suppression in EGMs is still an unresolved challenge. Within this context, the present work introduces the joint application of common notch filtering and Wavelet denoising for enhanced PLI removal in AF EGMs. The algorithm was validated on a set of 100 unipolar EGM signals, which were synthesized with different noise levels. Original and denoised EGMs were compared in terms of a signed correlation index (SCI), computed both in time and frequency domains. Compared with the single use of notch filtering, improvements between 4 and 15% were reached with Wavelet denoising in both domains. As a consequence, the proposed algorithm was able to efficiently reduce high levels of PLI and simultaneously preserve the original morphology of AF EGMs.

[1]  Gerhard Hindricks,et al.  Contemporary Mapping Techniques of Complex Cardiac Arrhythmias - Identifying and Modifying the Arrhythmogenic Substrate. , 2014, Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review.

[2]  Olaf Dössel,et al.  Removing ventricular far-field signals in intracardiac electrograms during stable atrial tachycardia using the periodic component analysis. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[3]  Samuel J Asirvatham,et al.  Signals and signal processing for the electrophysiologist: part I: electrogram acquisition. , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[4]  U Schotten,et al.  Current controversies in determining the main mechanisms of atrial fibrillation , 2016, Journal of internal medicine.

[5]  M. Zoni-Berisso,et al.  Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: European perspective , 2014, Clinical epidemiology.

[6]  S. Nattel,et al.  The value of basic research insights into atrial fibrillation mechanisms as a guide to therapeutic innovation: a critical analysis. , 2016, Cardiovascular research.

[7]  Michael Norris,et al.  Design and development of medical electronic instrumentation : a practical perspective of the design, construction, and test of medical devices , 2004 .

[8]  Rakesh Latchamsetty,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. , 2018, Annual review of medicine.

[9]  Mark E. Anderson,et al.  Progress toward the prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation: A summary of the Heart Rhythm Society Research Forum on the Treatment and Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation, Washington, DC, December 9-10, 2013. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[10]  Sudha Seshadri,et al.  50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study , 2015, The Lancet.

[11]  Yong Yan,et al.  Wavelet-based removal of sinusoidal interference from a signal , 2004 .

[12]  Jacques M T de Bakker,et al.  The Pathophysiologic Basis of Fractionated and Complex Electrograms and the Impact of Recording Techniques on Their Detection and Interpretation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[13]  Samuel J Asirvatham,et al.  Signals and Signal Processing for the Electrophysiologist: Part II: Signal Processing and Artifact , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[14]  Brian J Potter,et al.  Taking the pulse of atrial fibrillation , 2015, The Lancet.

[15]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Recording Techniques for Clinical Electrophysiology , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.