Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development

The participation of the general public in the research design, data collection and interpretation process together with scientists is often referred to as citizen science. While citizen science itself has existed since the start of scientific practice, developments in sensing technology, data processing and visualisation, and communication of ideas and results, are creating a wide range of new opportunities for public participation in scientific research. This paper reviews the state of citizen science in a hydrological context and explores the potential of citizen science to complement more traditional ways of scientific data collection and knowledge generation for hydrological sciences and water resources management. Although hydrological data collection often involves advanced technology, the advent of robust, cheap and low-maintenance sensing equipment provides unprecedented opportunities for data collection in a citizen science context. These data have a significant potential to create new hydrological knowledge, especially in relation to the characterisation of process heterogeneity, remote regions, and human impacts on the water cycle. However, the nature and quality of data collected in citizen science experiments is potentially very different from those of traditional monitoring networks. This poses challenges in terms of their processing, interpretation, and use, especially with regard to assimilation of traditional knowledge, the quantification of uncertainties, and their role in decision support. It also requires care in designing citizen science projects such that the generated data complement optimally other available knowledge. Lastly, we reflect on the challenges and opportunities in the integration of hydrologically-oriented citizen science in water resources management, the role of scientific knowledge in the decision-making process, and the potential contestation to established community institutions posed by co-generation of new knowledge.

[1]  Molla Mekonnen Alemu.  Sustainable Land Management , 2016 .

[2]  N. Doesken.  Seventeen years of measuring rain – experiences from the Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network , 2015 .

[3]  Dietmar Wechsler,et al.  Crowdsourcing as a method of transdisciplinary research : tapping the full potential of participants , 2014 .

[4]  M. Huijser,et al.  An evaluation of a citizen science data collection program for recording wildlife observations along a highway. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Susan Bell Trickett,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[7]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Motivations Affecting Initial and Long-Term Participation in Citizen Science Projects in Three Countries , 2014 .

[8]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Does motivation in citizen science change with time and culture? , 2014, CSCW Companion.

[9]  M. Kuper,et al.  Participatory analysis for adaptation to climate change in Mediterranean agricultural systems: possible choices in process design , 2014, Regional Environmental Change.

[10]  C. Potter,et al.  Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[11]  C. Wells,et al.  Monitoring for learning and developing capacities in the WASH sector , 2013 .

[12]  Sharachchandra Lele,et al.  Climate vulnerability and adaptation of water provisioning in developing countries: approaches to disciplinary and research-practice integration , 2013 .

[13]  Julien J. Harou,et al.  Robust Decision Making and Info-Gap Decision Theory for water resource system planning , 2013 .

[14]  Trisha Gura,et al.  Citizen science: Amateur experts , 2013, Nature.

[15]  Mordechai Haklay,et al.  Participatory monitoring of poaching in the Congo basin , 2013 .

[16]  I. Otto,et al.  Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change , 2013 .

[17]  Hidde Leijnse,et al.  Country-wide rainfall maps from cellular communication networks , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  John Gaventa,et al.  Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement , 2012 .

[19]  M. Krečmerová,et al.  Lipases as Tools in the Synthesis of Prodrugs from Racemic 9-(2,3-Dihydroxypropyl)adenine , 2012, Molecules.

[20]  Frances Cleaver,et al.  Development Through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management , 2012 .

[21]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms , 2012, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[22]  C. Kerven,et al.  Researching the Future of Pastoralism in Central Asia's Mountains: Examining Development Orthodoxies , 2012 .

[23]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement , 2012 .

[24]  J. McFarlin.  World Water Monitoring Challenge , 2012 .

[25]  Hans Jørgen Henriksen,et al.  Use of Bayesian belief networks for dealing with ambiguity in integrated groundwater management , 2012, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[26]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design , 2012 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  On virtual observatories and modelled realities (or why discharge must be treated as a virtual variable) , 2012 .

[28]  J. Macknick,et al.  Transboundary Forestry and Water Management in Nicaragua and Honduras: From Conflicts to Opportunities for Cooperation , 2012 .

[29]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[30]  Wouter Buytaert,et al.  Web-based environmental simulation: bridging the gap between scientific modeling and decision-making. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate – accounting for changing watershed behavior , 2011 .

[32]  T. Daw,et al.  Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[33]  M. Hare,et al.  Forms of Participatory Modelling and its Potential for Widespread Adoption in the Water Sector , 2011 .

[34]  Mike Pearson,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future , 2022 .

[35]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[36]  Krista G. Hilchey,et al.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[37]  D. Hannah,et al.  Large‐scale river flow archives: importance, current status and future needs , 2011 .

[38]  Timothy Karpouzoglou,et al.  ‘Our power rests with numbers’ Re-visiting the divide between ‘expert’ and ‘lay’ knowledge in contemporary wastewater governance: New Delhi, India , 2011 .

[39]  B. Fry,et al.  Community forest monitoring in REDD+: the ‘M’ in MRV? , 2011 .

[40]  Dan Cornford,et al.  Automatic processing, quality assurance and serving of real-time weather data , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[41]  D. Turner,et al.  Wet/Dry Mapping: Using Citizen Scientists to Monitor the Extent of Perennial Surface Flow in Dryland Regions , 2011, Environmental management.

[42]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[43]  Melinda Laituri,et al.  User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[44]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[45]  Bernd Siebenhüner,et al.  The role of social learning in adaptiveness: insights from water management , 2010 .

[46]  Christopher A. Dieckmann,et al.  Robust Decision Making , 2010 .

[47]  H. van Dijk,et al.  Synthesis Scenarios for Resilient Shrimp Aquaculture in Tropical Coastal Areas , 2010 .

[48]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography , 2010 .

[49]  C. Sampson,et al.  Use of terrestrial laser scanning data to drive decimetric resolution urban inundation models , 2010 .

[50]  G. Cundill,et al.  Monitoring the Governance Dimension of Natural Resource Co-management , 2010 .

[51]  Keith Beven,et al.  Regionalization as a learning process , 2009 .

[52]  J. Silvertown.  A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  Christo Fabricius,et al.  Monitoring in adaptive co-management: Toward a learning based approach. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  L. Sharpe.  Researching for the future , 2009 .

[55]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. , 2009 .

[56]  Keith Beven,et al.  Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed? , 2009 .

[57]  Lorna Sharpe,et al.  Researching the future , 2009 .

[58]  Peter Mollinga,et al.  Towards the transdisciplinary engineer: Incorporating ecology, equity and democracy concerns into water professionals' attitudes, skills and knowledge , 2009 .

[59]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[60]  Wouter Buytaert,et al.  Understanding the hydrology of tropical Andean ecosystems through an Andean network of basins , 2009 .

[61]  Jon Fjeldså,et al.  Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring: a Characterization of Approaches , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[62]  A. Boksenberg.  Virtual Observatories , 2009, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[63]  Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez,et al.  Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring: a Study of Five Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the western USA , 2008 .

[64]  Ph. Le Grusse,et al.  Use of a decision support system and a simulation game to help collective decision-making in water management , 2008 .

[65]  J. Cohn.  Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? , 2008 .

[66]  T. Pavelsky,et al.  Estimation of river discharge, propagation speed, and hydraulic geometry from space: Lena River, Siberia , 2008 .

[67]  Patricia A. McKinney,et al.  Expertise and Scientific Uncertainty: Understanding Trust Amongst Professional Stakeholders in Environment and Health , 2008 .

[68]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management? , 2008, Science.

[69]  S. Lakshminarayanan.  Using Citizens to Do Science Versus Citizens as Scientists , 2007 .

[70]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[71]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Simulation modeling in organizational and management research , 2007 .

[72]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[73]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Bayesian Networks and participatory modelling in water resource management , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[74]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Coupling real-time control and socio-economic issues in participatory river basin planning , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[75]  Finn Verner Jensen,et al.  Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[76]  K. Beven.  Environmental Modelling , 2007 .

[77]  S. Stagl,et al.  Empowering Designs: towards more progressive social appraisal of sustainability , 2007 .

[78]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2007 .

[79]  C. Findlay,et al.  The Rauischholzhausen Agenda for Road Ecology , 2007 .

[80]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[81]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Uncertainty and multiple objective calibration in regional water balance modelling: case study in 320 Austrian catchments , 2007 .

[82]  Dale J Blahna,et al.  Achieving Integrative, Collaborative Ecosystem Management , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[83]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Environmental Sensor Networks: A revolution in the earth system science? , 2006 .

[84]  Johanna Alkan Olsson,et al.  Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management , 2006 .

[85]  E. Wood,et al.  Development of a 50-Year High-Resolution Global Dataset of Meteorological Forcings for Land Surface Modeling , 2006 .

[86]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation , 2006, Environmental Conservation.

[87]  Neil D. Burgess,et al.  Monitoring Matters: Examining the Potential of Locally-based Approaches , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[88]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters , 2005 .

[89]  Christian Stock,et al.  3D visualisation of spatial information and environmental process model outputs for collaborative data exploration , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05).

[90]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participatory Integrated Assessment in local level planning , 2005 .

[91]  J. Bastiaensen,et al.  Poverty reduction as a local institutional process , 2005 .

[92]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  The Environmentalism of the Poor , 2005 .

[93]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Measuring surface water from space , 2004 .

[94]  Kellie B. Vaché,et al.  On the use of multiple criteria for a posteriori model rejection: Soft data to characterize model performance , 2004 .

[95]  Anna J. L. Carr.  Policy Reviews and Essays , 2004 .

[96]  Hugh A Robertson,et al.  Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[97]  G. Whitelaw,et al.  Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[98]  A. Mol,et al.  Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate , 2003, Environmental Values.

[99]  E Nicholson,et al.  Community data--where does the value lie? Assessing confidence limits of community collected water quality data. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[100]  C. D. Brown,et al.  Volunteer Lake Monitoring: Testing the Reliability of Data Collected by the Florida LAKEWATCH Program , 2002 .

[101]  L. Kruger,et al.  Getting to Know Ourselves and Our Places Through Participation in Civic Social Assessment , 2000 .

[102]  I. Scoones,et al.  Knowledge, power and politics: the environmental policy-making process in Ethiopia , 2000, The Journal of Modern African Studies.

[103]  Raúl E. Martínez,et al.  Methodology for public monitoring of total coliforms, Escherichia coli and toxicity in waterways by Canadian high school students , 2000 .

[104]  M. Löffler-Mang,et al.  An Optical Disdrometer for Measuring Size and Velocity of Hydrometeors , 2000 .

[105]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation , 1999 .

[106]  B. Frey.  Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation , 1998 .

[107]  T. Horlick-Jones,et al.  Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[108]  G. Vandewiele,et al.  Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization , 1995 .

[109]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[110]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases , 1993 .

[111]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[112]  P. Brown,et al.  Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing. , 1992, Journal of health and social behavior.

[113]  P. Haas.  Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control , 1989, International Organization.

[114]  Yehia El-khatib,et al.  Web technologies for environmental Big Data , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[115]  F. Cleaver,et al.  Capturing Critical Institutionalism: A Synthesis of Key Themes and Debates , 2014 .

[116]  C. Field,et al.  Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability - Part B: regional aspects - Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2014 .

[117]  M. Hipsey,et al.  Challenges for water-quality research in the new IAHS decade on: Hydrology Under Societal and Environmental Change , 2013 .

[118]  Chen Chen,et al.  Trust modeling for message relay control and local action decision making in VANETs , 2013, Secur. Commun. Networks.

[119]  Christopher S Lowry,et al.  CrowdHydrology: Crowdsourcing Hydrologic Data and Engaging Citizen Scientists , 2013, Ground water.

[120]  Prem,et al.  Changing water regime and adaptation strategies in Upper Mustang Valley of Upper Kaligandaki Basin in Nepal , 2013 .

[121]  Ashley Murphy Shelton,et al.  The accuracy of water quality monitoring data : a comparison between citizen scientists and professionals , 2013 .

[122]  Daniel R. Fuka,et al.  Technical Note: Proposing a Low-Tech, Affordable, Accurate Stream Stage Monitoring System , 2012 .

[123]  B. Büscher.  Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa , 2012 .

[124]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - Challenges and best practices , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[125]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Sustainable Land Management , 2011 .

[126]  Ph. Le Grusseb.  Use of a decision support system and a simulation game to help collective decision-making in water management , 2008 .

[127]  Trevor Birkenholtz,et al.  Contesting expertise: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern Indian groundwater practices , 2008 .

[128]  A. Craswell,et al.  Integrated assessment of water resources and global change : a north-south analysis , 2007 .

[129]  Empowering Designs : towards more progressive appraisal of sustainability , 2007 .

[130]  J. Patz,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[131]  K. Herweg,et al.  Sustainable land management: A new approach to soil and water conservation in Ethiopia , 2006 .

[132]  Anne Gunkel,et al.  The Application of Multi-Agent Systems for Water Resources Research - Possibilities and Limits , 2005 .

[133]  Kristine F. Stepenuck,et al.  Volunteer Stream Monitoring and Local Participation in Natural Resource Issues , 2004 .

[134]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Institutional failure and the organizational amplification of risks: the need for a closer look , 2003 .

[135]  M. Edelstein.  Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1998 .

[136]  T. G. Northcote,et al.  Freshwater ecosystems , 1992 .

[137]  P. Haas.  Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean , 1989 .

[138]  Chris Jones.  Possibilities and Problems , 1983 .

[139]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .