Strain-rate dependence of cartilage stiffness in unconfined compression: the role of fibril reinforcement versus tissue volume change in fluid pressurization.

The strain and strain-rate-dependent response of articular cartilage in unconfined compression was studied theoretically. The transient stress and stiffness of cartilage were determined for strain rates ranging from zero to infinity. It is shown, for a given compressive strain, that the axial stress initially increases quickly as a function of strain rate, and then increases progressively more slowly towards the stress corresponding to the instantaneous response. The volume change of the tissue does not give its transient stiffness uniquely, because of the strong strain-rate dependence. The variation of tissue stiffness is primarily determined by the transient stiffness of the radial fibrils. Load sharing between the solid matrix and fluid pressurization also depends on the strain rate. At 15% axial compression, the matrix bears more than 80% of the applied load at a strain rate of 0.005%/s, while the fluid pressurization contributes more than 80% of the load at a strain rate of 0.15%/s. These results show the interplay between fibril reinforcement and fluid pressurization in articular cartilage: the fluid drives fibril stiffening which in turn produces high pore pressure at high strain rates. As a secondary objective of the present work, a fibrillar continuum element was formulated to replace the fibrillar spring element used previously in fibril-reinforced modeling, in order to eliminate the deformation incompatibility between the spring system and the nonfibrillar matrix. The results obtained using the two fibrillar elements were compared with the closed-form solutions for the static and instantaneous responses for the case of large deformation. It was found for unconfined compression that using the spring elements did not generally result in greater numerical errors than using the fibrillar continuum elements.

[1]  J. E. Jeffrey,et al.  Matrix damage and chondrocyte viability following a single impact load on articular cartilage. , 1995, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[2]  A Oloyede,et al.  The dramatic influence of loading velocity on the compressive response of articular cartilage. , 1992, Connective tissue research.

[3]  R. U. Repo,et al.  Energy absorbing ability of articular cartilage during impact , 1979, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  I L Paul,et al.  A comparison of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Alterations in Mechanical Behaviour of Articular Cartilage due to Changes in Depth Varying Material Properties--a Nonhomogeneous Poroelastic Model Study , 2002, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[6]  A Oloyede,et al.  Stress-sharing between the fluid and solid components of articular cartilage under varying rates of compression. , 1993, Connective tissue research.

[8]  R. Haut,et al.  Chronic changes in rabbit retro‐patellar cartilage and subchondral bone after blunt impact loading of the patellofemoral joint , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  R. Haut,et al.  The extent of matrix damage and chondrocyte death in mechanically traumatized articular cartilage explants depends on rate of loading , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  G. Lust,et al.  Compositional and metabolic changes in damaged cartilage are peak‐stress, stress‐rate, and loading‐duration dependent , 1999 .

[11]  J. Suh,et al.  Biphasic poroviscoelastic simulation of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage: II--Effect of variable strain rates. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  R W Mann,et al.  Cartilage stresses in the human hip joint. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A fibril reinforced nonhomogeneous poroelastic model for articular cartilage: inhomogeneous response in unconfined compression. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  N. Broom,et al.  Fracture behaviour of cartilage-on-bone in response to repeated impact loading. , 1990, Connective tissue research.

[15]  W C Hayes,et al.  Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of cartilage in unconfined ramp compression using a fibril reinforced poroelastic model. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Strain-rate dependent stiffness of articular cartilage in unconfined compression. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[19]  N. Mukherjee,et al.  Load sharing between solid and fluid phases in articular cartilage: II--Comparison of experimental results and u-p finite element predictions. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  The role of fibril reinforcement in the mechanical behavior of cartilage. , 2002, Biorheology.

[21]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints--Part I: Tibial surface of the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Investigation of mechanical behavior of articular cartilage by fibril reinforced poroelastic models. , 2003, Biorheology.

[23]  W M Lai,et al.  Effects of nonlinear strain-dependent permeability and rate of compression on the stress behavior of articular cartilage. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  P. Torzilli,et al.  Effect of impact load on articular cartilage: cell metabolism and viability, and matrix water content. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.