EFFECTS OF SOIL NONLINEARITY ON GROUND RESPONSE IN 3 D SIMULATIONS — AN APPLICATION TO THE SALT LAKE CITY BASIN

Forty percent of the population in Utah lives in the Salt Lake Basin, in the vicinity of the Wasatch Front. This front, formed by the Wasatch fault, poses a significant seismic hazard. Recently, there has been an increased effort to understand the levels of excitation and ground response expected in the Salt Lake Basin. The development of the Wasatch Front Community Velocity Model has made it possible for the first time to analyze, through simulations, the relative importance of factors such as the depth of the sedimentary deposits, edge effects, and focusing, that influence ground shaking in this region. Another factor that has been observed to influence strong ground motion is the extent of inelastic deformation that occurs during an earthquake. We present initial results from a set of full three-dimensional (3D) simulations incorporating nonlinear soil behavior in the soft-soil deposits (Vs ≤ 500 m/s) in the basin, under a Mw 6.8 scenario earthquake. Simulations are performed using Hercules, the finite-element octree-based parallel earthquake simulator developed by the Quake Group at Carnegie Mellon University. Hercules incorporates a rate-dependent approach to simulate the elasto-visco-plastic behavior of soil materials. Our results are qualitatively consistent with observations from past earthquakes. They indicate that nonlinear soil behavior greatly affects the spatial variability of the ground motion, causes permanent displacements, and reduces peak ground velocities and accelerations. They also indicate that nonlinearity is influenced by 3D effects that cannot be reproduced by alternative hybrid or pseudo-nonlinear approaches commonly used in seismic hazard analysis.

[1]  David Carver,et al.  Nonlinear and Linear Site Response and Basin Effects in Seattle for the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake , 2002 .

[2]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  VISCO-PLASTICITY--PLASTICITY AND CREEP IN ELASTIC SOLIDS--A UNIFIED NUMERICAL SOLUTION APPROACH , 1974 .

[3]  Jacobo Bielak,et al.  Large-Scale Earthquake Simulation: Computational Seismology and Complex Engineering Systems , 2011, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[4]  Julio C. López,et al.  Speeding Up Finite Element Wave Propagation for Large-Scale Earthquake Simulations , 2010 .

[5]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  Nonlinear Soil Response a Reality? , 2022 .

[6]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Simulation of the response of the Marina District Basin, San Francisco, California, to the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1996 .

[7]  Kuo-Liang Wen,et al.  Non‐linear soil response in ground motions , 1994 .

[8]  Fusao Oka,et al.  CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS FOR NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED CLAY BASED ON ELASTO-VISCOPLASTICITY , 1982 .

[9]  T. Larkin,et al.  Comparison of linear and nonlinear seismic responses of two-dimensional alluvial basins , 1995 .

[10]  Philip J. Maechling,et al.  TeraShake2: Spontaneous Rupture Simulations of Mw 7.7 Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault , 2008 .

[11]  E. Field,et al.  Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1997, Nature.

[12]  Jianlin Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic ground motion modeling in basins , 2003 .

[13]  Robert W. Graves The Seismic Response of the San Bernardino Basin Region , 2002 .

[14]  J. Tinsley,et al.  Site response estimates in Salt Lake Valley, Utah, from borehole seismic velocities , 1993 .

[15]  Jacobo Bielak,et al.  Three dimensional nonlinear soil and site-city effects in urban regions , 2010 .

[16]  C. DuRoss Holocene Vertical Displacement on the Central Segments of the Wasatch Fault Zone, Utah , 2008 .

[17]  W. D. Richins,et al.  EARTHQUAKE STUDIES ALONG THE WASATCH FRONT, UTAH: NETWORK MONITORING, SEISMICITY, AND SEISMIC HAZARDS , 1980 .

[18]  Gideon Juve,et al.  The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets , 2010 .

[19]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  A three-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara Valley, California, from a Loma Prieta aftershock , 1992 .

[20]  Anthony F. Shakal,et al.  The site response of two rock and soil station pairs to strong and weak ground motion , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  T. Tu,et al.  From Mesh Generation to Scientific Visualization: An End-to-End Approach to Parallel Supercomputing , 2006, ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06).

[22]  Piotr Perzyna,et al.  The constitutive equations for rate sensitive plastic materials , 1963 .

[23]  L. Cluff,et al.  Recent Activity of the Wasatch Fault, Northwestern Utah, U.S.A. , 1975 .

[24]  A. Elgamal,et al.  Shear hysteretic elasto‐plastic earthquake response of soil systems , 1991 .

[25]  G. Schuster,et al.  Propagation and resonance of SH waves in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah , 1990 .

[26]  Jean Roman,et al.  High-performance finite-element simulations of seismic wave propagation in three-dimensional nonlinear inelastic geological media , 2010, Parallel Comput..

[27]  Michael G. Katona,et al.  Evaluation of Viscoplastic Cap Model , 1984 .

[28]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  The Wasatch fault zone, utah—segmentation and history of Holocene earthquakes , 1991 .