A method to detect important residues using protein binding site comparison.

As the number of protein sequences with unknown function increases, assigning accurate function to unknown protein becomes increasingly an important issue. Protein function is often encoded in a small number of residues located in binding pocket, and there have been many attempts to predict the function using the binding site. Here, we developed a binding site comparison method which can easily identify spatially matched residues between binding sites. Using clique detection algorithm, the new method finds the matched residues of maximum size, and then these matched residues are scored in a way similar to sequence alignment scoring. In addition, the significance of matched score is estimated from the empirical random score distribution. Results of benchmark test suggest that the method successfully detects functionally related binding sites. Furthermore, conserved residues and subfamily-specific residues in the functional family can be identified. In addition, we investigated systematic relationship between binding sites and functions using the binding site comparison method. Result showed that proteins with similar binding site largely perform similar function.

[1]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Recognition of Functional Sites in Protein Structures☆ , 2004, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[2]  Jie Liang,et al.  Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Gabriele Ausiello,et al.  Functional annotation by identification of local surface similarities: a novel tool for structural genomics , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Yoshikazu Ishii,et al.  Acyl-intermediate Structures of the Extended-spectrum Class A β-Lactamase, Toho-1, in Complex with Cefotaxime, Cephalothin, and Benzylpenicillin* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  J. Frère,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Actinomadura R39 DD-peptidase Reveals New Domains in Penicillin-binding Proteins* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Ziding Zhang,et al.  Similarity networks of protein binding sites , 2005, Proteins.

[7]  P. Sigler,et al.  Atomic structure of progesterone complexed with its receptor , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Claudine Mayer,et al.  Crystal structure of a mutant mineralocorticoid receptor responsible for hypertension , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  P. Willett,et al.  A graph-theoretic approach to the identification of three-dimensional patterns of amino acid side-chains in protein structures. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Pasch,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Evolution of Hormone-receptor Complexity by Molecular Exploitation , 2022 .

[11]  C. Bron,et al.  Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph , 1973 .

[12]  G. Klebe,et al.  A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  M Karplus,et al.  Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Susumu Goto,et al.  LIGAND: database of chemical compounds and reactions in biological pathways , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..