Computer-assisted questionnaires may facilitate collection of quality-of-life (QOL) data: At a cost

Abstract Quality-of-life (QOL) measurement is becoming increasingly important in oncology clinics. QOL questionnaires were mostly designed for use in clinical trials, and therefore focus on group measurement, inevitably omitting some details or domains that may be relevant to the individual patient. Computers can assist in the delivery of QOL questionnaires by presenting questions and by modifying subsequent questions. This study attempted to evaluate the use of computer-assisted (CA-) questionnaires for collection of QOL data from oncology patients. A total of 88 patients completed a standard questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30, and a computer-assisted version of the standard questionnaire on the same day. Both questionnaires were presented on a portable touchscreen computer. The CA-questionnaire allowed patients to pre-select domains from the standard questionnaire, and omit those which patients felt were irrelevant. Responses from both questionnaires were recorded, as well as exact and global agreement and time taken to complete the questionnaires. Although the time taken on CA-questionnaire was almost half that on the standard questionnaire, the levels of overall and exact agreement were relatively low. In general, patients reported lower levels of functioning and higher levels of symptoms on the standard questionnaire than CA-questionnaire. Computer-assisted questionnaires may provide a brief snapshot of patients’ QOL, however, some accuracy may be lost.

[1]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.

[2]  C. G. Watson,et al.  Do computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventories underestimate booklet-based scores? , 1992, Journal of clinical psychology.

[3]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  D. G. Altman,et al.  Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  P. Selby,et al.  Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  D. Cella,et al.  Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  L. Fallowfield,et al.  Can oncologists detect distress in their out-patients and how satisfied are they with their performance during bad news consultations? , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  J. Ware,et al.  Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. , 2000, Medical care.

[9]  N K Aaronson,et al.  Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[10]  C. Macduff,et al.  The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population , 1998, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer , 2000 .

[12]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. Browne,et al.  Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  Sallie Newell,et al.  Rapid assessment of psychosocial well-being: Are computers the way forward in a clinical setting? , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[15]  D. Forman,et al.  Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  C. McHorney,et al.  Generic Health Measurement: Past Accomplishments and a Measurement Paradigm for the 21st Century , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  D. Cella,et al.  Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing , 1997, Quality of Life Research.