Three-Dimensional Spiraling Finite Element Model of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlea

Objective The objective of the article is to provide an accurate model of the human cochlea with which potential distributions and thus neural excitation patterns around cochlear implant electrodes can be determined. Improvements on previous models of the implanted cochlea are that this model 1) includes the spiral nature of the cochlea as well as many other anatomical details (and it is a model of the human cochlear rather than the guinea pig cochlea), and 2) facilitates modeling of different electrode geometries, array locations and electrode separations without changing the structure of the model. Design A three-dimensional spiraling finite element model of the human cochlea was created. The model incorporates the effect of neighboring canals and conduction along the fluid-filled canals of the cochlea. Potential distributions are used as inputs to a nerve fiber model to investigate auditory nerve excitation patterns around intracochlear electrode arrays. Results Potential distributions around intracochlear electrodes generated with the finite element model are presented. The effects of electrode separation, electrode geometry and array location on excitation threshold, excitation spread and ectopic excitation (i.e., excitation of nerve fibers at an undesirable location) are demonstrated. Conclusions The following conclusions should be considered preliminary, as their accuracy depends on the exactness of the underlying model. The spiraling geometry of the cochlea causes asymmetry in potential distributions. The location of electrodes along the length of the basilar membrane has a stronger influence on the site of excitation than the polarity of the leading phase of the stimulus. Array location is the primary parameter that controls excitation spread. Threshold currents and the effect of ongoing loss of peripheral dendrites on threshold currents can be limited by placing arrays close to the modiolus. Point electrode geometries are recommended above banded electrode geometries only when the array can be placed close to the modiolus. There is a tradeoff between array location and the degree of ectopic stimulation caused by a specific array location. Bimodal excitation patterns exist at comfortable stimulus intensities for longitudinal bipolar electrode configurations. It is shown that an electrode configuration with an electrode separation of approximately half that of the bipolar electrode separation of the Nucleus electrode can be used instead of radial and offset radial electrode configurations to create unimodal excitation patterns. The stimulation resolution of cochlear implant electrode arrays can potentially be improved by increasing the number of electrode contacts in an array.

[1]  J.H.M. Frijns,et al.  A quantitative approach to modeling mammalian myelinated nerve fibers for electrical prosthesis design , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  P C Loizou,et al.  Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants. , 1999, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[3]  G. Clark ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY NERVE: THE CODING OF FREQUENCY, THE PERCEPTION OF PITCH AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT SPEECH PROCESSING STRATEGIES FOR PROFOUNDLY DEAF PEOPLE , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[4]  G. Girzon,et al.  Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes , 1987 .

[5]  A. Huxley,et al.  The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  G M Clark,et al.  Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B M Clopton,et al.  Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. , 1982, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[9]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T.L. Rose,et al.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes. VIII. Electrochemically safe charge injection limits with 0.2 ms pulses (neuronal application) , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  G M Clark,et al.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[12]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Sensory Effects of Transient Electrical Stimulation - Evaluation with a Neuroelectric Model , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  D. Kessler,et al.  The Clarion® Multi-Strategy™ Cochlear Implant , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[15]  Charles C. Finley,et al.  Models of Neural Responsiveness to Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[16]  R. L. Webb,et al.  Banded Intracochlear Electrode Array: Evaluation of Insertion Trauma in Human Temporal Bones , 1985, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[17]  D Strelioff A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R.L. White,et al.  The nerve-electrode interface of the cochlear implant: current spread , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  F. Rattay,et al.  The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system , 1999, Neuroscience.

[20]  G M Clark,et al.  Dimensions of the Scala Tympani in the Human and Cat with Reference to Cochlear Implants , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[21]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[22]  B M Clopton,et al.  Biophysical Measurements in the Implanted Cochlea , 1980, Otolaryngology and head and neck surgery.

[23]  R.V. Shannon,et al.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  G M Clark,et al.  Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Current Distribution Measurements Within the Human Cochlea , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  R. Schoonhoven,et al.  Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1995, Hearing Research.

[28]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[29]  F. Spelman,et al.  Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. , 1996, The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings.

[31]  N. Cohen,et al.  Electrode to modiolus proximity: a fluoroscopic and histologic analysis. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[32]  B M Clopton,et al.  Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array. , 1997, Medical progress through technology.

[33]  H. Spoendlin,et al.  Analysis of the human auditory nerve , 1989, Hearing Research.

[34]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  An analytical lumped-parameter 3D cochlear model and architecture for cochlear signal processing in VLSI , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Circuits and Systems Connecting the World. ISCAS 96.

[35]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[36]  J. Frijns,et al.  Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea , 1996, Hearing Research.

[37]  J R Johnstone,et al.  Membrane resistance in endolymphatic walls of the first turn of the guinea-pig cochlea. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.