Value and limits of μ‐CT for nondemineralized bone tissue processing

An experimental approach was performed on 20 giant rabbits to establish the possibilities and limitations of μ‐CT for routine processing of nondemineralized bone tissue. Hydroxyapatite (HA) or β‐tricalciumphosphate (β‐TCP) bead implants or a melange of both, microchambered and solid, were implanted into a standardized and precise defect in the patellar groove. The bone‐healing phase was chosen for the histology considering 1 or 2 days, and 2, 3, and 6 weeks. Normal X‐ray and μ‐CT were applied on all specimens; five specimens in the 6‐week stage were additionally processed according to the full range of conventional nondemineralized bone processing methods. μ‐CT increased the possibilities of nondemineralized histology with respect to bone morphometry and a complete sequence of sections, thus providing a complete analysis of the bone response. μ‐CT was limited in differentiating bone quality, cell analyses, and mineralization stages. The investigation based on normal X‐rays is limited to defining integration and excluding the fibrous and bony encapsulation of loose implants. μ‐CT allows a 3D evaluation of newly formed bone which is clearly marked against the ceramic implant. It does not allow, however, for the differentiation between woven and lamellar bone, the presentation of the canalicular lacunar system, or on the cell level, revealing canaliculi or details of the mineralization process which can be documented by high‐resolution microradiography. Titer dynamics of bone formation remains the domain of polychromatic sequential labeling.