Searching for the Good Plan

Despite the centrality of comprehensive plans to the profession of city and regional planning, there is a gap in knowledge about the quality of plans as they are not routinely evaluated against best practice standards. We discuss plan quality evaluation, an emerging methodology for assessing the quality of plans. We review the evolution of the concept, the dimensions covered, and the principles and criteria used. We then provide a comparative meta-analytic analysis of the findings from published plan quality evaluations, ranging from research studies in the United States to national planning policy applications in Holland and New Zealand, and offer recommendations about future directions in improving content analysis of plan documents and research design in plan quality evaluation.

[1]  R. Ewing,et al.  Land Use-Transportation Scenario Planning in an Era of Global Climate Change , 2008 .

[2]  Mary Margaret Edwards,et al.  Evaluating Smart Growth , 2007 .

[3]  K. Bartholomew.  Land use-transportation scenario planning: promise and reality , 2007 .

[4]  Charles Hoch,et al.  How Plan Mandates Work , 2007 .

[5]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning , 2007 .

[6]  K. Jackson,et al.  Robert Moses and the modern city : the transformation of New York , 2007 .

[7]  R. Bullard.  Growing smarter : achieving livable communities, environmental justice, and regional equity , 2007 .

[8]  Will Kalkhoff,et al.  Expectation States Theory and Research , 2006 .

[9]  Carl S. Smith.  The Plan of Chicago: Daniel Burnham and the Remaking of the American City , 2006 .

[10]  Philip Berke,et al.  What Makes Plan Implementation Successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand , 2006 .

[11]  Wesley E. Highfield,et al.  Measuring the Adoption of Local Sprawl , 2006 .

[12]  Richard K. Norton,et al.  More and Better Local Planning: State-Mandated Local Planning in Coastal North Carolina , 2005 .

[13]  S. Brody,et al.  Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida , 2004 .

[14]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[15]  P. Berke,et al.  Plan-making for Sustainability: The New Zealand Experience , 2004 .

[16]  David R. Godschalk,et al.  Land Use Planning Challenges: Coping with Conflicts in Visions of Sustainable Development and Livable Communities , 2004 .

[17]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  Native to Nowhere: Sustaining Home And Community In A Global Age , 2004 .

[18]  Samuel D. Brody,et al.  Are We Learning to Make Better Plans? , 2003 .

[19]  S. Brody.  Implementing the Principles of Ecosystem Management Through Local Land Use Planning , 2003 .

[20]  P. Berke,et al.  Planning and Indigenous People , 2002 .

[21]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[22]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Plan Quality and Mitigating Damage from Natural Disasters: A Case Study of the Northridge Earthquake with Planning Policy Considerations , 2002 .

[23]  Charles Hoch,et al.  Evaluating Plans Pragmatically , 2002 .

[24]  Lewis D. Hopkins,et al.  Do Plans Matter? , 2001 .

[25]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Urban Development: The Logic Of Making Plans , 2001 .

[26]  P. Berke,et al.  Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? , 2000 .

[27]  T. Beatley.  Green Urbanism: Learning From European Cities , 1999 .

[28]  P. Berke,et al.  Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Empirical Results from the New Zealand Experience , 1999 .

[29]  E. J. Kaiser,et al.  Unleashing the Power of Planning to Create Disaster-Resistant Communities , 1999 .

[30]  R. Deyle,et al.  Local Government Compliance with State Planning Mandates: The Effects of State Implementation in Florida , 1998 .

[31]  E. J. Kaiser,et al.  Natural Hazard Mitigation: Recasting Disaster Policy And Planning , 1998 .

[32]  William C. Baer,et al.  General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans , 1997 .

[33]  P. Berke,et al.  Coercive and Cooperative Intergovernmental Mandates: A Comparative Analysis of Florida and New Zealand Environmental Plans , 1997 .

[34]  P. May,et al.  Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use , 1997 .

[35]  Emily Talen,et al.  After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans , 1996 .

[36]  P. Berke.  Enhancing Plan Quality: Evaluating the Role of State Planning Mandates for Natural Hazard Mitigation , 1996 .

[37]  E. J. Kaiser,et al.  Twentieth Century Land Use Planning: A Stalwart Family Tree , 1995 .

[38]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Plans Can Matter! The Role of Land Use Plans and State Planning Mandates in Limiting the Development of Hazardous Areas , 1994 .

[39]  F. Wolf.  Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis , 1987 .

[40]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[41]  G. Glass.  9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research , 1977 .

[42]  Robert A. Caro,et al.  The power broker : Robert Moses and the fall of New York , 1975 .

[43]  F. Chapin,et al.  Urban Land Use Planning. , 1957 .