Development of rules and strategies: balancing the old and the new.

The experiments described in the lead articles replicate findings from previous studies of development of knowledge about balance scales, add several new findings, and raise four key questions: (a) How can rule use best be assessed? (b) How can we reconcile systematic use of rules with variable use of strategies? (c) When do children begin to use rules? and (d) How do children generate new rules? In this Reflection, we summarize current understanding of development of knowledge about balance scales and consider each of the four questions.

[1]  K. Crowley,et al.  The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[2]  R. Siegler,et al.  Developmental Differences in Rule Learning: A Microgenetic Analysis , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[4]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Modeling cognitive development with a generative connectionist algorithm , 1995 .

[5]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[6]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth of Logical Thinking , 1959 .

[7]  G. Halford,et al.  Young children's performance on the balance scale: the influence of relational complexity. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Chapter 5 Strategy Choices in Children's Time-Telling , 1989 .

[9]  Pat Langley,et al.  A general theory of discrimination learning , 1987 .

[10]  R. Siegler,et al.  Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: a microgenetic analysis. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  P. Langley,et al.  Production system models of learning and development , 1987 .

[12]  R. Siegler,et al.  The Development of a Proportionality Concept: Judging Relative Fullness , 1978 .

[13]  R. Siegler Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[14]  D. Klahr,et al.  The representation of children's knowledge. , 1978, Advances in child development and behavior.

[15]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  D. Hagner Balancing the Old and the New , 1997 .

[17]  R. Siegler Developmental Sequences within and between Concepts. , 1981 .

[18]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  On the Validity of Simulating Stagewise Development by Means of PDP Networks: Application of Catastrophe Analysis and an Experimental Test of Rule-Like Network Performance , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  J. Elman,et al.  Networks are not ‘hidden rules’ , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  R. Siegler,et al.  The rebirth of children's learning. , 2000, Child development.

[21]  Mark Wilson Saltus: A psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development. , 1989 .

[22]  C. Surber,et al.  Reversible operations in the balance scale task , 1984 .

[23]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[24]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  S. Normandeau,et al.  The balance-scale dilemma: either the subject or the experimenter muddles through. , 1989, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[26]  Dan Zakay,et al.  Time and human cognition : a life-span perspective , 1989 .

[27]  R. Siegler,et al.  Development of Time, Speed, and Distance Concepts , 1979 .