Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics

Motor imagery is known to involve brain regions vital to the performance of motor skills including primary motor cortex. The present results show that, following cerebral vascular accidents (CVAs) affecting a variety of these regions, many adults with left or right upper-limb paralysis (i.e. hemiparesis/hemiplegia) retain the ability to accurately represent prehensile movements involving the impaired limb. This suggests that during the acute phase of recovery many CVA patients can use motor imagery to activate partially damaged motor networks;a process that may facilitate functional reorganization. This ability was, however, compromised in cases with right posterior parietal or left frontal lesions. This pattern is consistent with the hypothesis that imagined prehension, like actual reaching and grasping, involves a network of highly interconnected areas distributed throughout parietal and frontal cortices.

[1]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  R. Gianutsos Cognitive rehabilitation: a neuropsychological speciality comes of age. , 1991, Brain injury.

[3]  H. Sakata,et al.  Hand-Movement-Related Neurons of the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Monkey: Their Role in the Visual Guidance of Hand Movements , 1992 .

[4]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  J. Decety The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  D. Crammond Motor imagery: never in your wildest dream , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  P. Wenderoth Comments on Parks's “Prior Experience of Form and Illusory Figures: New Demonstrations” , 1997, Perception.

[10]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society , 1997 .

[11]  S. H. Johnson,et al.  Cerebral Organization of Motor Imagery: Contralateral Control of Grip Selection in Mentally Represented Prehension , 1998 .

[12]  S. H. Johnson,et al.  Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension , 2000, Cognition.