Who’s on First? Stakeholder Differences in Customer Relationship Management and the Elusive Notion of “Shared Understanding”

After first demonstrating that definitions of customer relationship management (CRM) vary widely, we build upon stakeholder and network theories and argue that there are two fundamental categories of participants in any CRM initiative: (1) “core” stakeholders (i.e., the firm selling its products or services as well as its customers), and (2) various “noncore” stakeholders (e.g., CRM consultants). We then develop a process-based framework and related propositions capturing the various stakeholders involved in a CRM initiative as well as several important mediating and moderating relationships yet to receive attention in the literature. Next, we highlight the specific frame of reference and inherent biases of each type of CRM stakeholder, with particular emphasis on how each attempts to sell its offerings, services, or wares. At the core of our framework is a little-commented-upon mediating construct that we label “Shared Understanding of CRM.” The paper next offers an additional, and perhaps more pragmatic, framework for managers to garner a better understanding of which specific stakeholders are at work in any given CRM initiative, which type of customers might be involved, and which outcome variables or metrics might be salient. The paper’s conclusion offers insights into how the elusive goal of shared understanding of CRM might best be achieved.

[1]  D. Bovet,et al.  What Have We Learned so Far? Making CRM Make Money — Technology Alone Won’t Create Value , 2004 .

[2]  Frank V. Cespedes,et al.  The customer has escaped. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[3]  P. Verhoef Understanding the Effect of Customer Relationship Management Efforts on Customer Retention and Customer Share Development , 2003 .

[4]  C. Speier,et al.  The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies , 2002 .

[5]  W. Reinartz,et al.  The mismanagement of customer loyalty. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[6]  G. Day,et al.  Superiority in customer relationship management : consequences for competitive advantage and performance , 2002 .

[7]  L. Ryals,et al.  Cross-functional issues in the implementation of relationship marketing through customer relationship management , 2001 .

[8]  R. Winer A Framework for Customer Relationship Management , 2001 .

[9]  Larry Yu Successful Customer-Relationship Management , 2001 .

[10]  W. Reinartz,et al.  On the Profitability of Long-Life Customers in a Noncontractual Setting: An Empirical Investigation and Implications for Marketing , 2000 .

[11]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Kenneth D. Mackenzie,et al.  Processes and Their Frameworks , 2000 .

[13]  J. Sheth,et al.  The antecedents and consequences of customer-centric marketing , 2000 .

[14]  Sandy D. Jap Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer–Supplier Relationships , 1999 .

[15]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Marketing, Business Processes, and Shareholder Value: An Organizationally Embedded View of Marketing Activities and the Discipline of Marketing , 1999 .

[16]  George S. Day,et al.  Charting New Directions for Marketing , 1999 .

[17]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[18]  J. Johanson,et al.  Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships , 1999 .

[19]  Jeff Frooman Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[20]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Personal selling and sales management: A relationship marketing perspective , 1999 .

[21]  P. Kotler,et al.  Marketing in the Network Economy , 1999 .

[22]  Neil Rackham,et al.  Rethinking the Sales Force: Redefining Selling to Create and Capture Customer Value , 1999 .

[23]  John C. Haughey The Loyalty Effect , 1997, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[24]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[25]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[26]  Janek Ratnatunga,et al.  The role of marketing , 1995 .

[27]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[28]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[29]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[30]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[31]  Ravi S. Achrol,et al.  Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments , 1991 .

[32]  George S. Day,et al.  Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value , 1990 .

[33]  Charles B. Shrader,et al.  Structure, context, and centrality in interorganizational networks , 1990 .

[34]  D. Dougherty Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation , 1989 .

[35]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1987 .

[36]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[37]  T. Speh,et al.  The Marketing Strategy Center: Diagnosing the Industrial Marketer's Interdisciplinary Role , 1984 .

[38]  C. Fombrun Strategies for Network Research in Organizations , 1982 .

[39]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[40]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .