The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model

This paper studies multi-project firms at the edge of chaos, i.e. the ability of these companies to deal with the coexistence of order and chaos. It specifically defines the edge of chaos for multi-project firms based on the match between complexity of project portfolio and flexibility of its organisational units. It also provides a map to assess this match and mismatch. This map proposes four regions or organisational archetypes: the creative-reflective, the mechanic-structured, chaotification of order and bureaucratisation of chaos. Studies present in the literature illustrate these regions, and their importance to the management of projects and of these companies. The paper concludes by presenting possible applications of the framework and future research.

[1]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Project Management under Uncertainty: The Impact of Heuristics and Biases , 2002 .

[2]  Gerald Adlbrecht,et al.  On Faith, Fact, and Interaction in Projects , 2008 .

[3]  D. Hodgson.  Project Work: The Legacy of Bureaucratic Control in the Post-Bureaucratic Organization , 2004 .

[4]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Management Research: An Introduction , 1991 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[7]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[8]  M. Hobday.  The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[9]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[10]  Robert J. Might,et al.  The role of structural factors in determining project management success , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos , 1992 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[13]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Anatomy of Major Projects , 1987 .

[14]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change , 2000 .

[15]  Christopher G. Langton,et al.  Life at the Edge of Chaos , 1992 .

[16]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[17]  M. Tushman,et al.  The ambidextrous organization. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[18]  R. Katz.  The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[19]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit , 2003 .

[20]  L. Donaldson.  The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[21]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[22]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The management of innovation in project-based firms , 2000 .

[23]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[24]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics , 1993 .

[25]  Ana Paula Paes de Paula,et al.  A corrosão do caráter: conseqüências pessoais do trabalho no novo capitalismo , 2000 .

[26]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  The bureaucratization of the project manager function: The case of the construction industry , 2006 .

[27]  H L Michael,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH. INTRODUCTION , 1973 .

[28]  Joana Geraldi.  Patterns of complexity: The thermometer of complexity , 2006 .

[29]  Roland Gareis,et al.  Management of the Project‐Oriented Company , 2007 .

[30]  James P. Ignizio,et al.  Foreword , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[31]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[32]  A. Jaafari.  Project Management in the Age of Complexity and Change , 2003 .

[33]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[34]  Joan C. Woodward.  Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[35]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Reflexive Methodology, New Vistas for Qualitative Research (Book) , 2002 .

[36]  David Bennett,et al.  Enhancing performance through the introduction of customer orientation into the building components industry , 2006 .

[37]  Joana Geraldi,et al.  Synchronising Projects and Competences: An Empirical Study conducted within the German Plant Engineering Industry , 2006 .

[38]  Peter W. G. Morris.  Managing Project Interfaces—Key Points for Project Success , 2008 .

[39]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall , 1990 .

[40]  Stephen Tallman.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[41]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[42]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[43]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[44]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[45]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[46]  William R. King,et al.  Project Management Handbook , 1983 .

[47]  Boulevard de Constance,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002 .

[48]  Nils O.E. Olsson,et al.  Management of flexibility in projects , 2006 .

[49]  Jeffrey Katz.  Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive , 1998 .

[50]  Perttu Dietrich,et al.  Mechanisms for Inter-Project Integration-Empirical Analysis in Program Context , 2006 .

[51]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[52]  Joana Geraldi,et al.  Unraveling complexities in engineering projects , 2006 .

[53]  J. Benders.  Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive , 1999 .

[54]  M. Engwall.  No project is an island: linking projects to history and context , 2003 .

[55]  C. Franklin,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2001 .

[56]  J. Turner,et al.  Project Categorization Systems: Aligning Capability With Strategy for Better Results , 2005 .

[57]  David H. Gobeli,et al.  Significance of project management structure on development success , 1989 .

[58]  Richard T. Pascale,et al.  Managing on the edge : how successful companies use conflict to stay ahead , 1990 .

[59]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  The product-process-organisation relationship in complex development projects , 2000 .

[60]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[61]  R. Müller,et al.  Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type , 2007 .

[62]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[63]  Jan Terje Karlsen,et al.  Management of project contingency and allowance , 2005 .

[64]  Børge Obel,et al.  Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Christine Räisänen,et al.  Technologizing Discourse to Standardize Projects in Multi-Project Organizations: Hegemony by Consensus? , 2004 .

[66]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[67]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects , 2004 .

[68]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .