Asynchronous switching of flagellar motors on a single bacterial cell

Salmonella possesses several flagella, each capable of counterclockwise and clockwise rotation. Counterclockwise rotation produces swimming, clockwise rotation produces tumbling. Switching between senses occurs stochastically. The rotational sense of individual flagella on a single cell could be monitored under special conditions (partially de-energized cells of cheC and cheZ mutants). Switching was totally asynchronous, indicating that the stochastic process operates at the level of the individual organelle. Coordinated rotation in the flagellar bundle during swimming may therefore derive simply from a high counterclockwise probability enhanced by mechanical interactions, and not from a synchronizing switch mechanism. Different flagella on a given cell had different switching probabilities, on a time scale (greater than 2 min) spanning many switching events. This heterogeneity may reflect permanent structural differences, or slow fluctuations in some regulatory process.

[1]  Y Imae,et al.  Quantitative measurements of proton motive force and motility in Bacillus subtilis , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  H. Berg,et al.  A protonmotive force drives bacterial flagella. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R M Macnab,et al.  Proton chemical potential, proton electrical potential and bacterial motility. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  R. Macnab,et al.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Simon,et al.  Flagellar rotation and the mechanism of bacterial motility , 1974, Nature.

[6]  V. Skulachev,et al.  The proton pump is a molecular engine of motile bacteria , 1978, Nature.

[7]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Interaction of the cheC and cheZ gene products is required for chemotactic behavior in Escherichia coli. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[9]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[10]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Functional homology of chemotaxis genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  J. Shioi,et al.  Characterization of the Bacillus subtilis motile system driven by an artificially created proton motive force , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  D. Koshland,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis in the absence of receptor carboxylmethylation , 1981, Cell.

[13]  R. Macnab,et al.  The steady-state counterclockwise/clockwise ratio of bacterial flagellar motors is regulated by protonmotive force. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  D E Koshland,et al.  Bacterial motility and chemotaxis: light-induced tumbling response and visualization of individual flagella. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  H. Vogel,et al.  Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. , 1956, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  D. Koshland,et al.  Chemotactic mechanism of Salmonella typhimurium: preliminary mapping and characterization of mutants , 1977, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  J. Adler,et al.  Protein methylation in behavioural control mechanisms and in signal transduction , 1979, Nature.

[18]  D. Koshland,et al.  Construction and behavior of strains with mutations in two chemotaxis genes , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  R. Macnab.  Bacterial flagella rotating in bundles: a study in helical geometry. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R M Macnab,et al.  Examination of bacterial flagellation by dark-field microscopy , 1976, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[21]  Gerald L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Sensory Transduction in Bacterila Chemotaxis , 1983 .

[22]  H. Berg,et al.  Dynamic properties of bacterial flagellar motors , 1974, Nature.

[23]  J. Adler,et al.  Chemomechanical coupling without ATP: the source of energy for motility and chemotaxis in bacteria. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  H. Berg,et al.  Energetics of flagellar rotation in bacteria. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  R. Macnab,et al.  Inversion of a behavioral response in bacterial chemotaxis: explanation at the molecular level. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  H. Berg,et al.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis , 1982, Nature.

[28]  D. Koshland.  Bacterial chemotaxis in relation to neurobiology. , 1980, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  D. Koshland,et al.  Isolation, characterization and complementation of Salmonella typhimurium chemotaxis mutants. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  J. Adler,et al.  Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli , 1974, Nature.

[31]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  B. L. Taylor,et al.  Novel sensory adaptation mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis to oxygen and phosphotransferase substrates. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.