Conversational Functions for Knowledge Building: a Study of an Online Course at University

Interactions in online courses have been studied by analyzing Conversational Functions used by participants. Cacciamani, Perrucci Khanlari (2016) developed a coding scheme, named CF4KB, consisting of four Global Conversational Functions (GCF), each articulated in two Specific Conversational Functions (SCF). The aims of the present study were to explore: 1) What are the more frequently SCF used by the participants, both at the beginning and at the end of an online course, and if there are differences between the beginning and the end of the course in terms of SCF used; 2) If there is any specific pattern of SCF used at the beginning and at the end of the course and if there are any persistences in using the same SCF. For these aims, 152 messages posted in Knowledge Forum online environment by 24 university students (19 F and 5 M) were considered. The messages have been segmented into units of meaning and the 1451 resulting segments have been coded by two independent judges who applied the CF4KB. The analysis of frequencies evidenced the more frequently used SCF, at the beginning and the end of the course. Comparing SCF frequencies between the beginning and the end of the course, differences were detected. Results showed also different patterns in the use of the SCF at the beginning and at the end of the course. In addition, the persistence of one SCF was found. Implication of these results for the analysis of the interactions in online courses are discussed.

[1]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Practices and orientations of CSCL , 2004 .

[2]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building Environments: Extending the Limits of the Possible in Education and Knowledge Work , 2003 .

[3]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Nobuko Fujita,et al.  Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[5]  S. Cacciamani.  Experiential Learning and Knowledge Building in Higher Education: an Application of the Progressive Design Method , 2017 .

[6]  Alyssa Friend.  Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions , 2012 .

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  G. Weimann.  The Influentials: People Who Influence People , 1994 .

[9]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology , 2006 .

[10]  Elvis Mazzoni,et al.  La Social Network Analysis (SNA) applicata alle comunità virtuali per l’apprendimento: analisi strutturale delle interazioni all’interno dei Web forum , 2005 .

[11]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions , 2012 .

[12]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[13]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  A. Hare,et al.  Types of Roles in Small Groups , 1994 .

[15]  K. Hakkarainen,et al.  The Knowledge Creation Metaphor – An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning , 2005 .

[16]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Postmodernism, Knowledge Building, and Elementary Science , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Judith B. Pena-Shaff,et al.  Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Edward J. Caropreso,et al.  Influence of Personality on Online Discussion. , 2004 .