SARs for pocket-mounted mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz.

Increasingly, mobile telephones are becoming pocket-sized and are being left in the shirt pocket with a connection to the ear for hands-free operation. We have considered an anatomic model of the chest and a planar phantom recommended by US FCC to compare the peak 1 and 10 g SARs for four typical cellular telephones, two each at 835 and 1900 MHz. An agreement within +/- 10% is obtained between calculated and experimental 1 and 10 g SARs for various separations (2-8 mm) from the planar phantom used to represent different thicknesses of the clothing both for the antenna away from or turned back towards the body. Because of the closer placement of the antennas relative to the body, the peak 1 and 10 g SARs are considerably higher (by a factor of 2-7) for pocket-mounted telephones as compared to the SARs obtained using a 6 mm thick plastic ear head model--a procedure presently accepted both in the US and Europe. This implies that a telephone tested for SAR compliance against the model of the head may be severely out of compliance if it were placed in the shirt pocket.

[1]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz , 1996 .

[3]  J. Herbertz Comment on the ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998, Health physics.

[4]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Electromagnetic absorption in the human head from experimental 6-GHz handheld transceivers , 1995 .

[5]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[6]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. J. Joseph,et al.  Advances in Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite - Di erence Time - Domain Method , 1998 .

[8]  M. Stuchly,et al.  A study of the handset antenna and human body interaction , 1996 .

[9]  Reilly Jp Comments concerning "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 1999 .

[10]  O P Gandhi,et al.  Power deposition in the head and neck of an anatomically based human body model for plane wave exposures. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Qishan Yu,et al.  An automated SAR measurement system for compliance testing of personal wireless devices , 1999 .

[12]  Yahya Rahmat-Samii,et al.  EM interaction of handset antennas and a human in personal communications , 1995, Proc. IEEE.