Carrier-priming leads to hapten-specific suppression

Studies over the past two decades have established1,2 that ‘helper’ T lymphocytes primed to a ‘carrier’ protein increase B-lymphocyte antibody responses to ‘haptenic’ determinants on the carrier protein. T cells from donors primed with one commonly used carrier protein, keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH), have been shown by many workers to augment B-cell IgG anti-dinitrophenyl (DNP) responses in adoptive recipients stimulated with DNP-KLH. Therefore, we were surprised recently to find that the KLH-primed mice we normally use as donors for carrier-specific helper T cells in adoptive transfers3 show reduced rather than augmented IgG in situ anti-DNP antibody production when stimulated with DNP-KLH. Here we show that hapten-specific regulation of antibody production is responsible for this response failure. That is, that KLH-priming before DNP-KLH exposure reduces the production of IgG anti-DNP antibody without interfering with the anti-KLH response or with the development of anti-DNP memory B cells, and that IgG anti-DNP production remains low after further stimulation with DNP on KLH or an unrelated carrier. Thus initial stimulation with a carrier-protein creates an oddly compromised animal in which IgG antibody production to a ‘new’ haptenic determinant on the carrier is kept minimal despite the presence of normal anti-hapten memory and carrier-specific help capable of supporting other responses to the hapten-carrier conjugate.

[1]  N. Mitchison,et al.  The carrier effect in the secondary response to hapten‐protein conjugates. I. Measurement of the effect with transferred cells and objections to the local environment hypothesis , 1971, European journal of immunology.

[2]  T. Tada THE MODE AND SITES OF ACTION OF SUPPRESSOR T CELLS IN THE ANTIGEN-INDUCED DIFFERENTIATION OF B CELLS , 1974 .

[3]  R. Woodland,et al.  Idiotype‐specific T helper cells are required to induce idiotype‐positive B memory cells to secrete antibody , 1978, European journal of immunology.

[4]  B. B. Mishell,et al.  Selected Methods in Cellular Immunology , 1980 .

[5]  K. Eichmann,et al.  Idiotype suppression. III. Induction of unresponsiveness to sensitization with anti‐idiotypic antibody: identification of the cell types tolerized in high zone and in low zone, suppressor cellmediated, idiotype suppression , 1978, European journal of immunology.

[6]  O. Mäkelä,et al.  Effect of Carrier Preimmunization on the Anti‐Hapten Response in the Chicken , 1974, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[7]  S. F. St.Groth Cross Recognition and Cross Reactivity , 1967 .

[8]  S. Black,et al.  Regulatory circuits and antibody responses , 1980, European journal of immunology.

[9]  D. Katz,et al.  CARRIER FUNCTION IN ANTI-HAPTEN IMMUNE RESPONSES I. ENHANCEMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ANTI-HAPTEN ANTIBODY RESPONSES BY CARRIER PREIMMUNIZATION , 1970 .

[10]  R. Gershon,et al.  Feedback induction of suppressor T-cell activity , 1975, The Journal of experimental medicine.