Higher order image structure enables boundary segmentation in the absence of luminance or contrast cues.

Lower order image statistics, which can be described by an image's Fourier energy content, enable segmentation when they are different on either side of a boundary. We have previously demonstrated that the spatial distribution of the energy in an image (described by its higher order statistics or structure) could influence segmentation thresholds for contrast- and orientation-defined boundaries, even though it was the same on either side of the boundary and thus task irrelevant (Zavitz & Baker, 2013). Here we examined whether higher order statistics can also enable segmentation when boundaries are defined by differences in structure or density of texture elements. We used micropattern-based naturalistic synthetic textures to manipulate the sparseness, global phase alignment, and local phase alignment of carrier textures and measured segmentation thresholds based on forced-choice judgments of boundary orientation. We found that both global phase structure and sparseness, but not local phase alignment, enable segmentation and that local structure also has a small effect on segmentation thresholds in both cases. Simulations of a two-stage filter model with a compressive intermediate nonlinearity can reproduce the major features of the experimental data, segmenting boundaries defined by higher order statistics alone while capturing the influence of global image structure on segmentation thresholds.

[1]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  H. C. Nothdurft,et al.  Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[3]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Hierarchical processing of complex motion along the primate dorsal visual pathway , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  The role of V1 surround suppression in MT motion integration. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Sharpe.  Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. , 2004 .

[6]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures , 1997, Vision Research.

[7]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[9]  Isamu Motoyoshi,et al.  Differential roles of contrast polarity reveal two streams of second-order visual processing , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  Bela Julesz,et al.  A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first-order statistics of textons , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Texture sparseness, but not local phase structure, impairs second-order segmentation , 2013, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Hess,et al.  What causes non-monotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images? , 2002, Current Biology.

[13]  D. Heeger.  Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  David H. Foster,et al.  Role of second- and third-order statistics in the discriminability of natural images , 1997 .

[15]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  R J Baddeley,et al.  A general rule for sensory cue summation: evidence from photographic, musical, phonetic and cross-modal stimuli , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  Béla Julesz,et al.  Visual Pattern Discrimination , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Mary M. Conte,et al.  Interaction of luminance and higher-order statistics in texture discrimination , 2005, Vision Research.

[20]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial summation in simple (fourier) and complex (non-fourier) texture channels , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Pooling of first-order inputs in second-order vision , 2013, Vision Research.

[22]  A. Watson,et al.  Motion-contrast sensitivity: visibility of motion gradients of various spatial frequencies , 1994 .

[23]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial-frequency- and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation , 1993, Vision Research.

[24]  M. R. Turner,et al.  Texture discrimination by Gabor functions , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  Bruce C Hansen,et al.  Structural sparseness and spatial phase alignment in natural scenes. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  R. Shepard.  Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  E. Adelson,et al.  Early vision and texture perception , 1988, Nature.

[29]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[30]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[31]  L N Piotrowski,et al.  A Demonstration of the Visual Importance and Flexibility of Spatial-Frequency Amplitude and Phase , 1982, Perception.

[32]  Orientation, density and size as cues to texture segmentation in kittens , 1995, Vision Research.

[33]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[34]  M. Landy,et al.  Properties of second-order spatial frequency channels , 2002, Vision Research.

[35]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Visual perception of texture , 2002 .

[36]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  Donald F. Klein,et al.  Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research , 2005 .

[38]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[39]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[40]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[42]  C. Baker,et al.  Higher order texture statistics impair contrast boundary segmentation. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[43]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Temporal frequency and chromatic processing in humans: an fMRI study of the cortical visual areas. , 2011, Journal of vision.