Pore structure of natural and regenerated soil aggregates: an x-ray computed tomography analysis

Quantitative characterization of aggregate pore structure can reveal the evolution of aggregates under different land use and management practices and their effects on soil processes and functions. Advances in X-ray computed tomography (CT) provide powerful means to conduct such characterization. This study examined aggregate pore structure of three differently managed same textured Danish soils (mixed forage cropping, MFC; mixed cash cropping, MCC; cereal cash cropping, CCC) for (i) natural aggregates, and (ii) aggregates regenerated after 20 month of incubation. In total, 27 aggregates (8–16 mm) were sampled from nine different treatments; three natural soils and three repacked lysimeters without and three with organic matter (OM; ground rape) amendment. Three dimensional X-ray CT images, tensile strength, and organic carbon (OC) were obtained for each aggregate. Aggregate-associated OC differed significantly between the three soils as 2.1, 1.4, and 1.0% for MFC, MCC, and CCC, respectively. Aggregate porosity and pore connectivity were significantly higher for CCC aggregates than for MFC and MCC aggregates. The CCC aggregates had an average pore diameter of 300 micrometer, whereas MFC and MCC had an average pore diameter of 200 and 170 micrometer, respectively. Pore shape analysis indicated that CCC and MFC aggregates had an abundance of rounded and elongated pores, respectively, and those of MCC were in-between CCC and MFC. Aggregate pore structure development in the lysimeters was nearly similar irrespective of the soil type and organic matter amendment, and was vastly different from the state of natural aggregates. Aggregate porosity (>30 micrometer) was observed to be a good predictor for the mechanical properties of aggregates. In general natural aggregates were stronger than lysimeter aggregates.

[1]  A. S. Rogowski,et al.  Rupture Parameters of Soil Aggregates 1 , 1968 .

[2]  R. J. Haynes,et al.  Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review , 1998, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[3]  P. Schjønning,et al.  Soil resistance and resilience to mechanical stresses for three differently managed sandy loam soils , 2012 .

[4]  D. Tanaka,et al.  Soil Property Changes during Conversion from Perennial Vegetation to Annual Cropping , 2001 .

[5]  A. Dexter,et al.  The influence of organic matter in reducing the destabilization of soil by simulated tillage , 1997 .

[6]  Sandra J Shefelbine,et al.  BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. , 2010, Bone.

[7]  A. Franzluebbers,et al.  Climatic influences on active fractions of soil organic matter , 2001 .

[8]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[9]  E. B. Skvortsova,et al.  Changes in the geometric structure of pores and aggregates as indicators of the structural degradation of cultivated soils , 2009 .

[10]  I. Grieve,et al.  Liming upland grassland: the effects on earthworm communities and the chemical characteristics of carbon in casts , 2008 .

[11]  A. Kravchenko,et al.  Can intra-aggregate pore structures affect the aggregate's effectiveness in protecting carbon? , 2013 .

[12]  R. J. Haynes,et al.  Influence of six crop species on aggregate stability and some labile organic matter fractions , 1997 .

[13]  B. Kay,et al.  Soil structure and organic carbon: a review. , 1998 .

[14]  Liu Zhi-bin,et al.  Micropore Structure of Aggregates in Treated Soils , 2007 .

[15]  K. Paustian,et al.  Soil organic carbon pool changes following land‐use conversions , 2004 .

[16]  W. M. Post,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Organic Carbon of Soil Aggregates in the Northern Appalachians , 2005 .

[17]  R. Lal,et al.  SOIL AGGREGATE PROPERTIES AND ORGANIC CARBON FOR SWITCHGRASS AND TRADITIONAL AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES , 2005 .

[18]  H. Rahimi,et al.  The Effect of Soil Organic Matter, Electrical Conductivity, and Sodium Adsorption Ratio on Tensile Strength of Aggregates , 2000 .

[19]  A. Dexter,et al.  Factors contributing to the tensile strength and friability of Oxisols , 2002 .

[20]  Mark L. Rivers,et al.  Long‐term Differences in Tillage and Land Use Affect Intra‐aggregate Pore Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[21]  A. Franzluebbers,et al.  Surface-soil structural properties under grass and cereal production on a Mollic Cyroboralf in Canada , 2004 .

[22]  B. Kay,et al.  Effect of Water Regime on Aggregate-tensile Strength, Rupture Energy, and Friability , 2002 .

[23]  V. Snyder,et al.  A Method for Studying the Effects of Soil Aggregate Size and Density , 1996 .

[24]  P. Schjønning,et al.  Soil Infrastructure, Interfaces & Translocation Processes in Inner Space ("Soil-it-is"): towards a road map for the constraints and crossroads of soil architecture and biophysical processes , 2009 .

[25]  R. Lal,et al.  Soil structure and management: a review , 2005 .

[26]  A. Kravchenko,et al.  Intra-aggregate Pore Characteristics: X-ray Computed Microtomography Analysis , 2012 .

[27]  Patrice Delmas,et al.  Coupling X-ray microtomography and mercury intrusion porosimetry to quantify aggregate structures of a cambisol under different fertilisation treatments , 2012 .

[28]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil structure and organic carbon relationships following 10 years of wheat straw management in no-till , 2007 .

[29]  C. Dominy,et al.  Influence of agricultural land management on organic matter content, microbial activity and aggregate stability in the profiles of two Oxisols , 2002, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[30]  Alvin J. M. Smucker,et al.  Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Porosity within Macroaggregates Modified by Tillage , 2005 .

[31]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Computing Local Thickness of 3D Structures with ImageJ , 2007, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[32]  A. Hemmat,et al.  Effects of farmyard manure and tillage systems on soil physical properties and corn yield in central Iran , 2002 .

[33]  Johan Six,et al.  Carbon Sequestration in Microaggregates of No‐Tillage Soils with Different Clay Mineralogy , 2004 .

[34]  P. Schjønning,et al.  Soil structure and microbial activity dynamics in 20‐month field‐incubated organic‐amended soils , 2014 .

[35]  W. Cornelis,et al.  Amending a loamy sand with three compost types: impact on soil quality , 2011 .

[36]  Anthony R. Dexter,et al.  Methodology for determination of tensile strength of soil aggregates , 1985 .

[37]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil processes and the carbon cycle. , 1998 .

[38]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[39]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Adaptive document image binarization , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[40]  M. Pagliai,et al.  Soil structure and the effect of management practices , 2004 .

[41]  R. Lal,et al.  Tillage and drainage impact on soil quality: II. Tensile strength of aggregates, moisture retention and water infiltration , 2009 .

[42]  E. Perfect,et al.  Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil aggregation in an Ultisol as characterized by synchrotron based X-ray micro-computed tomography , 2013 .

[43]  Rainer Horn,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore-space features using synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography , 2008 .

[44]  J. Six,et al.  A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics , 2004 .