Brain Potentials Reflect Behavioral Differences in True and False Recognition

People often falsely recognize nonstudied lures that are semantically similar to previously studied words. Behavioral research suggests that such false recognition is based on high semantic overlap between studied items and lures that yield a feeling of familiarity, whereas true recognition is more often associated with the recollection of details. Despite this behavioral evidence for differences between true and false recognition, research measuring brain activity (PET, fMRI, ERP) has not clearly differentiated corresponding differences in brain activity. A median split was used to separate subjects into Good and Poor performers based on their discrimination of studied targets from similar lures. Only Good performers showed late (1000-1500 msec), right frontal event-related brain potentials (ERPs) that were more positive for targets and lures compared with new items. The right frontal differences are interpreted as reflecting postretrieval evaluation processes that were more likely to be engaged by Good than Poor performers. Both Good and Poor performers showed a parietal ERP old/new effect (400-800 msec), but only Poor performers showed a parietal old/lure difference. These results are consistent with the view that the parietal and frontal ERP old/new effects reflect dissociable processes related to recollection.

[1]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval Orientation and the Control of Recollection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Neuropsychology of Memory Illusions: False Recall and Recognition in Amnesic Patients , 1996 .

[3]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[4]  E. Hirshman,et al.  True and False Recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a Global Matching Perspective , 1998 .

[5]  D. Schacter,et al.  Gist-Based False Recognition of Pictures in Older and Younger Adults , 1997 .

[6]  E L Wilding,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Michael D Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring , 1996, Neuroreport.

[9]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[10]  Cyma Van Petten,et al.  Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neuropsychological data , 1999 .

[11]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response latencies for false memories: gist-based processes in normal aging. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[12]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  T Shallice,et al.  Preserved recall versus impaired recognition. A case study. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  S. Rapcsak,et al.  Neuropsychological mechanisms of false facial recognition following frontal lobe damage , 1999 .

[16]  D. Schacter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  E. Tulving,et al.  Task-related and item-related brain processes of memory retrieval. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Tucker.  Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Dissociating Automatic and Consciously Controlled Effects of Study/Test Compatibility , 1996 .

[20]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  K. Kuriyama,et al.  Biochemical-physiology correlations in studies of the γ-aminobutyric acid system , 1968 .

[22]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Neural correlates of depth of processing effects on recollection: evidence from brain potentials and positron emission tomography , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Michael E. Smith.  Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  A. Dale,et al.  Late Onset of Anterior Prefrontal Activity during True and False Recognition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[28]  M. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection , 1998 .

[31]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Recognising and Remembering , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[33]  B. Murdock.  A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[34]  J. Deese.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  WHEN TRUE MEMORIES SUPPRESS FALSE MEMORIES: EFFECTS OF AGEING , 1999 .

[39]  M. Posner,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of brain electrical fields , 1994 .

[40]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: An event-related potential study , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  ERP correlates of true and false recognition after different retention delays: stimulus- and response-related processes. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  When True Recognition Suppresses False Recognition: Evidence from Amnesic Patients , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[44]  G. Miller.  Normal, pathological, and other states of mind: A review of Normality and pathology in cognitive functions, edited by Andrew W. Ellis. London: Academic Press, 1982, pp. xi + 327. ISBN 0-2-237480-0. λ36.00 , 1984 .

[45]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Attempting to Avoid Illusory Memories: Robust False Recognition of Associates Persists under Conditions of Explicit Warnings and Immediate Testing ☆ ☆☆ , 1998 .

[46]  H. Roediger.  MEMORY ILLUSIONS , 2019, Experiencing the Impossible.

[47]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[48]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[49]  D L Hintzman,et al.  When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Brain Potentials during Memory Retrieval Provide Neurophysiological Support for the Distinction between Conscious Recollection and Priming , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  R L Buckner,et al.  Memory, consciousness and neuroimaging. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[52]  D. Schacter,et al.  Illusory memories in amnesic patients: conceptual and perceptual false recognition. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[53]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  VERIDICAL AND FALSE MEMORIES IN HEALTHY OLDER ADULTS AND IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER'S TYPE , 1999 .

[54]  D. Schacter,et al.  Functional–Anatomic Study of Episodic Retrieval Using fMRI I. Retrieval Effort versus Retrieval Success , 1998, NeuroImage.

[55]  D. Gallo,et al.  Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories? , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  T. Curran.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Jamie Ward,et al.  False recognition after frontal lobe damage: The role of encoding factors , 1999 .

[58]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—a review , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[59]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations , 1998 .

[60]  D. Schacter,et al.  False recognition and the right frontal lobe: A case study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recollection of associative information. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[62]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[63]  D. Schacter,et al.  Perceptually based false recognition of novel objects in amnesia : Effects of category size and similarity to category prototypes , 1999 .

[64]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[65]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[66]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Monitoring Conscious Recollection via the Electrical Activity of the Brain , 1995 .

[67]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  False memories and confabulation , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A Hippocampal Model of Recognition Memory , 1997, NIPS.

[69]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  False recognition after a right frontal lobe infarction: Memory for general and specific information , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  Tim Curran,et al.  Late frontal brain potentials distinguish true and false recognition , 2003, Neuroreport.

[71]  L. Wildingg.  Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success ] an event ! related potential study of source memory , 2022 .

[72]  Tim Curran,et al.  Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: an ERP study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[73]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[74]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional–Anatomic Study of Episodic Retrieval II. Selective Averaging of Event-Related fMRI Trials to Test the Retrieval Success Hypothesis , 1998, NeuroImage.

[75]  T. Curran,et al.  The electrophysiology of incidental and intentionalretrieval: erp old⧸new effects in lexical decision andrecognition memory , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  Tim Curran,et al.  Differentiating location- and distance-based processes in memory for time: An ERP study , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[77]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The Similarity of Brain Activity Associated with True and False Recognition Memory Depends On Test Format , 1997 .

[78]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Veridical and Illusory Recognition Memory: Evidence from Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Neuron.

[79]  M. Rugg.  ERP studies of memory. , 1995 .

[80]  M I Posner,et al.  Topography of the N400: brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectancy. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[81]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[82]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[83]  Veronica J. Dark,et al.  Perceptual Fluency and Recognition Judgments , 1985 .

[84]  M. Rugg,et al.  Modality-specific effects of immediate word repetition: electrophysiological evidence. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[85]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[86]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  FALSE RECALL AND FALSE RECOGNITION: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF SELECTIVE AND COMBINED LESIONS TO THE MEDIAL TEMPORAL LOBE/DIENCEPHALON AND FRONTAL LOBE STRUCTURES , 1999 .

[87]  Alan J. Parkin,et al.  Pathological False Alarm Rates Following Damage to the Left Frontal Cortex , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[88]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[89]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[90]  W. Donaldson.  Measuring recognition memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[91]  O Bertrand,et al.  A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[92]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  An event‐related potential study of retroactive interference in memory , 1997, Neuroreport.

[93]  E. Balint.  Memory and consciousness. , 1987, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[94]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Recognition Memory and Memory for Source: An fMRI Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[95]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[96]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  FALSE-RECOGNITION REVERSAL: WHEN SIMILARITY IS DISTINCTIVE , 1995 .

[97]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.