Squeezed state metrology with Bragg interferometers operating in a cavity

Bragg interferometers, operating using pseudospin-1/2 systems composed of two momentum states, have become a mature technology for precision measurements. State-of-the-art Bragg interferometers are rapidly surpassing technical limitations and are soon expected to operate near the projection noise limit set by uncorrelated atoms. Despite the use of large numbers of atoms, their operation is governed by single-atom physics. Motivated by recent proposals and demonstrations of Raman gravimeters in cavities, we propose a scheme to squeeze directly on momentum states for surpassing the projection noise limit in Bragg interferometers. In our modeling, we consider the unique issues that arise when a spin squeezing protocol is applied to momentum pseudospins. Specifically, we study the effects of the momentum width of the atomic cloud and the coupling to momentum states outside the pseudospin manifold, as these atoms interact via a mode of the cavity. We show that appreciable levels of spin squeezing can be demonstrated in suitable parameter regimes in spite of these complications. Using this setting, we show how beyond mean-field techniques developed for spin systems can be adapted to study the dynamics of momentum states of interacting atoms. Our scheme promises to be feasible using current technology and is experimentally attractive because it requires no additional setup beyond what will be required to operate Bragg interferometers in cavities.

[1]  Samuel P Nolan,et al.  Optimal and Robust Quantum Metrology Using Interaction-Based Readouts. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[2]  J. E. Debs,et al.  Atom lasers: Production, properties and prospects for precision inertial measurement , 2012, 1209.2172.

[3]  J. E. Debs,et al.  Precision atomic gravimeter based on Bragg diffraction , 2012, 1207.1595.

[4]  R. Kaiser,et al.  Scaling behavior of a very large magneto-optical trap , 2014, 1410.1832.

[5]  S. Chiow,et al.  102ℏk large area atom interferometers. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[6]  Onur Hosten,et al.  Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms , 2016, Nature.

[7]  Joseph J. Hope,et al.  Why momentum width matters for atom interferometry with Bragg pulses , 2011, 1110.2901.

[8]  A. Rey,et al.  Many-Body Quantum Spin Dynamics with Monte Carlo Trajectories on a Discrete Phase Space , 2014, 1408.4441.

[9]  G. W. Snedecor STATISTICAL METHODS , 1967 .

[10]  Hengyun Zhou,et al.  Observation of discrete time-crystalline order in a disordered dipolar many-body system , 2016, Nature.

[11]  Ueda,et al.  Squeezed spin states. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Momentum-resolved detection for high-precision Bragg atom interferometry , 2018, Physical Review A.

[13]  Chenghui Yu,et al.  Atom‐Interferometry Measurement of the Fine Structure Constant , 2019, Annalen der Physik.

[14]  M. Kasevich,et al.  Phase Shift in an Atom Interferometer due to Spacetime Curvature across its Wave Function. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[15]  V. Vuletić,et al.  Implementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[16]  Leonardo Salvi,et al.  Atom Interferometry with the Sr Optical Clock Transition. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[17]  Murray Sargent,et al.  Elements of Quantum Optics , 1991 .

[18]  R. Graham,et al.  DYNAMICAL QUANTUM NOISE IN TRAPPED BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES , 1998 .

[19]  S. Phoenix Elements of Quantum Optics , 1991 .

[20]  M. Kasevich,et al.  Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale , 2015, Nature.

[21]  Vacuum spin squeezing , 2017, 1703.02439.

[22]  J. Bollinger,et al.  Modeling near ground-state cooling of two-dimensional ion crystals in a Penning trap using electromagnetically induced transparency , 2018, Physical Review A.

[23]  R. J. Lewis-Swan,et al.  Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interactions in a strontium superradiant laser , 2017, Science.

[24]  Leonardo Salvi,et al.  Squeezing on Momentum States for Atom Interferometry. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[25]  H. Carmichael Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 , 2008 .

[26]  R. J. Lewis-Swan,et al.  Robust Spin Squeezing via Photon-Mediated Interactions on an Optical Clock Transition. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[27]  The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: limits of validity and applications , 2002, cond-mat/0201217.

[28]  Chenghui Yu,et al.  Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model , 2018, Science.

[29]  Benjamin Plotkin-Swing,et al.  Three-Path Atom Interferometry with Large Momentum Separation. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[30]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum-Enhanced Measurements: Beating the Standard Quantum Limit , 2004, Science.

[31]  Graham P. Greve,et al.  Deterministic Squeezed States with Collective Measurements and Feedback. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[32]  M. L. Wall,et al.  Nonequilibrium dynamics of spin-boson models from phase space methods , 2017, 1705.06203.

[33]  M. L. Wall,et al.  Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hundreds of trapped ions , 2015, Science.

[34]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Direct Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[35]  Matthew Rispoli,et al.  Quantum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system , 2016, Science.

[36]  M. Kasevich,et al.  Matter wave lensing to picokelvin temperatures. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[37]  Tommaso Mazzoni,et al.  Bragg gravity-gradiometer using the 1S0–3P1 intercombination transition of 88Sr , 2017, 1712.01388.

[38]  J. Bollinger,et al.  Steady-state spin synchronization through the collective motion of trapped ions , 2016, 1612.04421.

[39]  K. G. Jackson,et al.  Observation of a transition between dynamical phases in a quantum degenerate Fermi gas , 2018, Science Advances.

[40]  M. Schleier-Smith,et al.  Squeezing the collective spin of a dilute atomic ensemble by cavity feedback , 2009, 0911.3936.

[41]  M. Rispoli,et al.  Probing entanglement in a many-body–localized system , 2018, Science.

[42]  M. Chiofalo,et al.  Many-Body Entanglement in Short-Range Interacting Fermi Gases for Metrology. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[43]  L. Mandel,et al.  Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement , 2000, Physical review letters.

[44]  Franco Nori,et al.  Quantum spin squeezing , 2010, 1011.2978.

[45]  A. Polkovnikov Phase space representation of quantum dynamics , 2009, 0905.3384.

[46]  Kevin C. Cox,et al.  Reduced spin measurement back-action for a phase sensitivity ten times beyond the standard quantum limit , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[47]  A. Rey,et al.  Out-of-equilibrium quantum magnetism and thermalization in a spin-3 many-body dipolar lattice system , 2018, Nature Communications.

[48]  N. J. Engelsen,et al.  Quantum phase magnification , 2016, Science.

[49]  V. Vuletić,et al.  Erratum: Implementation of Cavity Squeezing of a Collective Atomic Spin [Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 , 073602 (2010)] , 2011 .

[50]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles , 2016, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[51]  H. Carmichael Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2: Non-Classical Fields , 2007 .

[52]  P. Haslinger,et al.  Efficient Adiabatic Spin-Dependent Kicks in an Atom Interferometer. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[53]  Gregory S. Bentsen,et al.  Approaching the Heisenberg Limit without Single-Particle Detection. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[54]  P. W. Hess,et al.  Observation of a discrete time crystal , 2016, Nature.

[55]  Holger Muller,et al.  Atom interferometry in an optical cavity , 2014, 2014 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[56]  Walker,et al.  Collective behavior of optically trapped neutral atoms. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[57]  C. W. Gardiner,et al.  Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques , 2008, 0809.1487.

[58]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  Detecting Large Quantum Fisher Information with Finite Measurement Precision. , 2015, Physical review letters.