Surface‐distributed low‐frequency asynchronous stimulation delays fatigue of stimulated muscles

Introduction: One important reason why functional electrical stimulation (FES) has not gained widespread clinical use is the limitation imposed by rapid muscle fatigue due to non‐physiological activation of the stimulated muscles. We aimed to show that asynchronous low‐pulse‐rate (LPR) electrical stimulation applied by multipad surface electrodes greatly postpones the occurrence of muscle fatigue compared with conventional stimulation (high pulse rate, HPR). Methods: We compared the produced force vs. time of the forearm muscles responsible for finger flexion in 2 stimulation protocols, LPR (fL = 10 Hz) and HPR (fH = 40 Hz). Results: Surface‐distributed low‐frequency asynchronous stimulation (sDLFAS) doubles the time interval before the onset of fatigue (104 ± 80%) compared with conventional synchronous stimulation. Conclusions: Combining the performance of multipad electrodes (increased selectivity and facilitated positioning) with sDLFAS (decreased fatigue) can improve many FES applications in both the lower and upper extremities. Muscle Nerve 48: 930–937, 2013

[1]  William K. Durfee,et al.  Doublet stimulation to reduce fatigue in electrically stimulated muscle during controlled leg lifts , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[2]  D. Graupe,et al.  Stochastically-modulated stimulation to slow down muscle fatigue at stimulated sites in paraplegics using functional electrical stimulation for leg extension , 2000, Neurological research.

[3]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Inference of motor unit recruitment order in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  B. Bigland-ritchie,et al.  Muscle fatigue induced by stimulation with and without doublets , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[5]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Motor unit recruitment order during voluntary and electrically induced contractions in the tibialis anterior , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  U Proske,et al.  A new strategy for controlling the level of activation in artificially stimulated muscle. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Lana Z. Popovic,et al.  Muscle fatigue of quadriceps in paraplegics: Comparison between single vs. multi-pad electrode surface stimulation , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  M. Popovic,et al.  Electrical stimulation as a means for achieving recovery of function in stroke patients. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[9]  S A Binder-Macleod,et al.  Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Selectivity and Resolution of Surface Electrical Stimulation for Grasp and Release , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  M. Popovic,et al.  Reducing muscle fatigue due to functional electrical stimulation using random modulation of stimulation parameters. , 2005, Artificial organs.

[12]  W. Durfee,et al.  Reducing muscle fatigue in FES applications by stimulating with N-let pulse trains , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  T. Keller,et al.  A SYSTEM FOR MEASURING FINGER FORCES DURING GRASPING , 2000 .

[14]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Twitch analysis as an approach to motor unit activation during electrical stimulation. , 1994, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[15]  M. Morari,et al.  Spatially distributed sequential stimulation reduces fatigue in paralyzed triceps surae muscles: a case study. , 2011, Artificial organs.

[16]  J S Petrofsky,et al.  Closed-loop control of movement of skeletal muscle. , 1985, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[17]  R. Enoka,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the training effects associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[18]  S. Binder-Macleod,et al.  The effects of stimulation frequency and fatigue on the force–intensity relationship for human skeletal muscle , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  A J Fuglevand,et al.  Force-frequency and fatigue properties of motor units in muscles that control digits of the human hand. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Popović,et al.  Distributed low‐frequency functional electrical stimulation delays muscle fatigue compared to conventional stimulation , 2010, Muscle & nerve.

[21]  Thierry Keller,et al.  A multi-pad electrode based functional electrical stimulation system for restoration of grasp , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.