Iterating influence between players in a social network

We generalize a yes-no model of influence in a social network with a single step of mutual influence to a framework with iterated influence. Each agent makes an acceptance- rejection decision and has an inclination to say either ‘yes' or ‘no'. Due to influence by others, an agent's decision may be different from his original inclination. Such a transformation from the inclinations to the decisions is represented by an influence function. We analyze the decision process in which the mutual influence does not stop after one step but iterates. Any classical influence function can be coded by a stochastic matrix, and a generalization leads to stochastic influence functions. We apply Markov chains theory to the analysis of stochastic binary influence functions. We deliver a general analysis of the convergence of an influence function and then study the convergence of particular influence functions. This model is compared with the Asavathiratham model of influence. We also investigate models based on aggregation functions. In this context, we give a complete description of terminal classes, and show that the only terminal states are the consensus states if all players are weakly essential.

[1]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[2]  Carl D. Meyer,et al.  Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra , 2000 .

[3]  Lloyd S. Shapley,et al.  On authority distributions in organizations: controls , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A model of influence in a social network , 2010 .

[5]  U. Krause A DISCRETE NONLINEAR AND NON–AUTONOMOUS MODEL OF CONSENSUS FORMATION , 2007 .

[6]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[7]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Word-of-Mouth Communication and Social Learning , 1995 .

[8]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  J. Conlisk Stability and monotonicity for interactive Markov chains , 1992 .

[10]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[11]  J. Lehoczky Approximations for interactive Markov chains in discrete and continuous time , 1980 .

[12]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[14]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions , 2005, 0708.2981.

[15]  John Conlisk,et al.  A stability theorem for an interactive Markov chain , 1978 .

[16]  Lloyd S. Shapley,et al.  On authority distributions in organizations: equilibrium , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds , 2010 .

[18]  P. DeMarzo,et al.  Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Uni-Dimensional Opinions , 2001 .

[19]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[20]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Social Learning , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Sandip Roy,et al.  The influence model , 2001 .

[22]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Bayesian learning in social networks , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  J. French A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychology Review.

[24]  Holger Hermanns,et al.  Interactive Markov Chains , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[25]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[26]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  R. Berger A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reaching a Consensus Using DeGroot's Method , 1981 .

[28]  C. Hoede,et al.  A theory of decisional power , 1982 .

[29]  Frank Harary,et al.  Status and Contrastatus , 1959 .

[30]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social positions in influence networks , 1997 .

[31]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Influence functions, followers and command games , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[32]  N. Pimlott Learning from the neighbours. , 2012, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[33]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Word-of-mouth learning , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[34]  Eugene Seneta,et al.  Non‐Negative Matrices , 1975 .

[35]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Measuring influence in command games , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[36]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[37]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Different approaches to influence based on social networks and simple games , 2010 .

[38]  S. Goyal,et al.  Conformism and diversity under social learning , 2001 .

[39]  Shachar Kariv,et al.  Distinguishing Informational Cascades from Herd Behavior in the Laboratory , 2004 .

[40]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A model of influence with an ordered set of possible actions , 2010 .